Carbucicchio C, Lavarra F, Riva S, Fassini G, Della Bella P
Istituto di Cardiologia, Università degli Studi, Milano.
Cardiologia. 1995 Dec;40(12):927-40.
The modulation of atrioventricular (AV) conduction by radiofrequency catheter ablation of the "slow" AV node pathway reduces the ventricular rate during atrial flutter (AFL) or fibrillation (AF), without affecting AV conduction during sinus rhythm. In this study the acute and long-term effects of AV node modulation in 41 patients with AFL-AF are presented. The arrhythmia was paroxysmal in 34 and chronic in 7 patients, and was responsible in all patients for severe symptoms of heart failure. The procedure was performed during sinus rhythm in 23, AFL in 8, AF in 10 patients, and caused respectively an increase in Wenckebach cycle from 330 +/- 64 to 452 +/- 91 ms (p < 0.001), and a reduction in ventricular rate from 182 +/- 53 to 95 +/- 40 b/min (p < 0.001) and from 170 +/- 40 to 90 +/- 27 b/min (p < 0.001). The arbitrary endpoint of the procedure (Wenckebach cycle > 500 ms during sinus rhythm, maximum heart rate < 100 b/min during AFL-AF) was achieved in 19/41 patients; permanent complete AV block was induced in 6 "non-responder" patients (15%). At a mean follow-up of 15 +/- 7 months (range 1-31) all patients reported a substantial subjective improvement and a better exercise tolerance--as documented by a quantitative questionnaire concerning quality of life--without any recurrence of acute pulmonary edema, syncope or severe hypotension. In 5 patients during paroxysmal AFL-AF, and in 1 patient with chronic AF, a heart rate higher than 120 b/min was documented, and in 3 cases it was associated with severe palpitations. No late AV block occurred. The mean number of hospital-emergency room admissions per patient per year decreased from 3.9 before to 0.2 after the modulation. Considering complete AV block (6 patients, 15%) and clinical failures (6 patients, 15%), the success of the procedure was 70%, and was independent of the rhythm at the time of the procedure; the percentage of AV block was nevertheless higher during AFL-AF (22 vs 9%). Both endpoints of the procedure (Wenckebach cycle > 500 ms; heart rate < 100 b/min) were confirmed to be good predictors of long-term efficacy; on the other hand, a Wenckebach cycle < 430 ms was demonstrated to represent a specific marker of late failure. In conclusion, the study confirms that modulation of AV conduction is feasible in 70% of patients with AFL-AF: in these patients the procedure allows the long-term control of ventricular rate and a substantial improvement in quality of life, avoiding the need for His ablation and pacemaker implantation. "Non-responder" patients can be acutely identified and should be therefore considered condidates for His ablation during the same session.
通过射频导管消融“慢”房室结通路来调节房室传导,可降低心房扑动(AFL)或心房颤动(AF)时的心室率,而不影响窦性心律时的房室传导。本研究展示了41例AFL-AF患者中房室结调节的急性和长期效果。心律失常在34例患者中为阵发性,7例为慢性,所有患者均有严重心力衰竭症状。该手术在23例窦性心律患者、8例AFL患者、10例AF患者中进行,分别使文氏周期从330±64毫秒增加到452±91毫秒(p<0.001),心室率从182±53次/分钟降至95±40次/分钟(p<0.001),以及从170±40次/分钟降至90±27次/分钟(p<0.001)。41例患者中有19例达到了手术的任意终点(窦性心律时文氏周期>500毫秒,AFL-AF时最大心率<100次/分钟);6例“无反应”患者(15%)发生了永久性完全性房室传导阻滞。平均随访15±7个月(范围1-31个月),所有患者均报告主观症状有显著改善,运动耐量提高——这通过一份关于生活质量的定量问卷得到证实——且无急性肺水肿、晕厥或严重低血压复发。在5例阵发性AFL-AF患者和1例慢性AF患者中,记录到心率高于120次/分钟,其中3例伴有严重心悸。无晚期房室传导阻滞发生。每位患者每年的医院急诊就诊次数从术前的3.9次降至术后的0.2次。考虑到完全性房室传导阻滞(6例患者,15%)和临床失败(6例患者,15%),手术成功率为70%,且与手术时的心律无关;不过,AFL-AF期间房室传导阻滞的发生率更高(22%对9%)。手术的两个终点(文氏周期>500毫秒;心率<100次/分钟)均被证实是长期疗效的良好预测指标;另一方面,文氏周期<430毫秒被证明是晚期失败的一个特异性标志。总之,该研究证实,70%的AFL-AF患者可行房室传导调节:在这些患者中,该手术可实现心室率的长期控制,并显著改善生活质量,避免了希氏束消融和起搏器植入的需要。“无反应”患者可在术中被急性识别,因此应被视为同期希氏束消融的候选者。