Cormican M G, Wilke W W, Barrett M S, Pfaller M A, Jones R N
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Jul;25(3):107-12. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(96)00125-3.
Detection of oxacillin-resistance in staphylococci by phenotypic methods remains problematic. Although standardized susceptibility test methods are adequate for Staphylococcus aureus, many are less satisfactory for the coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). We have studied 108 consecutive blood culture isolates of staphylococci. The mec A gene was detected by PCR in one S. aureus and 55 CNS isolates. Susceptibility testing was performed as follows: oxacillin (1-microgram), ceftizoxime (30-microgram), and cephalothin (30-microgram) by disk diffusion; oxacillin, ceftizoxime, cephalothin, methicillin, ampicillin, ampicillin/ sulbactam, penicillin, cefazolin, imipenem, and meropenem by the broth microdilution method. In addition, isolates were tested by the oxacillin agar screen plate method. The single oxacillin-resistant S. aureus strain was detected by all oxacillin susceptibility test methods and by the ceftizoxime disk and MIC methods. Two oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus were intermediate (minor error) by ceftizoxime broth microdilution (MIC, 16 micrograms/mL). The most sensitive, simple phenotypic methods for detection of oxacillin-resistant CNS (mec A positive) were as follows: oxacillin disk diffusion at 98%, oxacillin screen plate at 91%, oxacillin broth microdilution at 87%, ceftizoxime disk diffusion at 100%, ceftizoxime broth microdilution at 87%, and methicillin broth microdilution at 83%. These results indicate that oxacillin and ceftizoxime disk diffusion tests are the most accurate phenotypic methods in routine clinical use for detection of oxacillin-resistant CNS. Oxacillin broth microdilution MIC testing (2% NaCl supplement) would perform more satisfactorily (100% sensitivity) with an adjusted interpretive breakpoint at < or = 0.5 microgram/mL, in contrast to the lower accuracy of the "so-called" reference agar screen test.
采用表型方法检测葡萄球菌对苯唑西林的耐药性仍然存在问题。尽管标准化的药敏试验方法适用于金黄色葡萄球菌,但许多方法对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)的效果较差。我们研究了108株连续血培养分离的葡萄球菌。通过PCR在1株金黄色葡萄球菌和55株CNS分离株中检测到mec A基因。药敏试验如下:采用纸片扩散法检测苯唑西林(1微克)、头孢唑肟(30微克)和头孢噻吩(30微克);采用肉汤微量稀释法检测苯唑西林、头孢唑肟、头孢噻吩、甲氧西林、氨苄西林、氨苄西林/舒巴坦、青霉素、头孢唑林、亚胺培南和美罗培南。此外,采用苯唑西林琼脂筛选平板法检测分离株。所有苯唑西林药敏试验方法以及头孢唑肟纸片法和MIC法均检测到1株耐苯唑西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株。2株对苯唑西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌通过头孢唑肟肉汤微量稀释法(MIC,16微克/毫升)检测为中介(小误差)。检测耐苯唑西林CNS(mec A阳性)最灵敏、简单的表型方法如下:苯唑西林纸片扩散法为98%,苯唑西林筛选平板法为91%,苯唑西林肉汤微量稀释法为87%,头孢唑肟纸片扩散法为100%,头孢唑肟肉汤微量稀释法为87%,甲氧西林肉汤微量稀释法为83%。这些结果表明,苯唑西林和头孢唑肟纸片扩散试验是常规临床检测耐苯唑西林CNS最准确的表型方法。与“所谓”的参考琼脂筛选试验较低的准确性相比,苯唑西林肉汤微量稀释MIC试验(补充2%氯化钠)在调整的解释性折点为≤0.5微克/毫升时表现更令人满意(100%敏感性)。