van Lieburg A F, Knoers N V, Monnens L A, Smits P
Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Hypertens. 1995 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1695-700.
To assess which vasopressin receptor subtype mediates the vasodilation occurring in response to arginine vasopressin and 1-desamino-8-D (DD)-arginine vasopressin and whether nitric oxide is involved in these effects.
Vasoactive effects of arginine vasopressin and DD-arginine vasopressin on forearm vasculature were studied in healthy subjects and in patients with congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus with a vasopressin type 2 (V2) receptor gene defect. Venous occlusion plethysmography was used to assess the forearm blood flow responses to the infusion of arginine vasopressin and its analogue into the brachial artery, in the presence and the absence of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NG-monomethyl-arginine (L-NMMA).
In healthy subjects (n =10), DD-arginine vasopressin (0.1, 1 and 10 or 5, 10 and 20 ng/min per dl) induced a dose-related increase in forearm blood flow, but did not affect forearm blood flow in the patients with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (n = 3). In two healthy subjects, seven increasing doses of arginine vasopressin (0.25-12 ng/min per dl) induced an initial decrease in forearm blood flow and then a gradual increase. In one of the patients, the same arginine vasopressin doses produced a persistent decrease in forearm blood flow. In the healthy subjects, infusion of L-NMMA reduced forearm blood flow significantly (n = 10). Subsequent administration of DD-arginine vasopressin during L-NMMA infusion produced a slight reduction in the forearm blood flow increase compared with DD-arginine vasopressin alone, but this was significant only for the absolute forearm blood flow increase induced by 10 ng/min per dl in all subjects. Infusion of arginine vasopressin in the presence of L-NMMA did not increase forearm blood flow significantly.
In human forearm vasculature, extrarenal V2 receptors mediate the vasodilation induced by DD-arginine vasopressin or high doses of arginine vasopressin, whereas these receptors are not necessary for arginine vasopressin-induced vasoconstriction. The DD-arginine vasopressin-induced vasodilation seems to be mediated predominantly by a mechanism other than endothelial nitric oxide release, whereas arginine vasopressin-induced vasodilation seems to involve nitric oxide release only.
评估哪种血管加压素受体亚型介导了因精氨酸血管加压素和1-去氨基-8-D(DD)-精氨酸血管加压素而发生的血管舒张,以及一氧化氮是否参与这些效应。
在健康受试者和患有血管加压素2型(V2)受体基因缺陷的先天性肾性尿崩症患者中,研究了精氨酸血管加压素和DD-精氨酸血管加压素对前臂血管系统的血管活性作用。使用静脉阻塞体积描记法评估在有无一氧化氮合酶抑制剂L-NG-单甲基-精氨酸(L-NMMA)的情况下,将精氨酸血管加压素及其类似物注入肱动脉后前臂血流的反应。
在健康受试者(n = 10)中,DD-精氨酸血管加压素(0.1、1和10或5、10和20 ng/min每分升)导致前臂血流呈剂量相关增加,但对肾性尿崩症患者(n = 3)的前臂血流无影响。在两名健康受试者中,七个递增剂量的精氨酸血管加压素(0.25 - 12 ng/min每分升)最初导致前臂血流减少,然后逐渐增加。在其中一名患者中,相同剂量的精氨酸血管加压素使前臂血流持续减少。在健康受试者中,输注L-NMMA显著降低了前臂血流(n = 10)。在L-NMMA输注期间随后给予DD-精氨酸血管加压素,与单独使用DD-精氨酸血管加压素相比,前臂血流增加略有减少,但仅在所有受试者中由10 ng/min每分升诱导的绝对前臂血流增加方面具有统计学意义。在L-NMMA存在的情况下输注精氨酸血管加压素并未显著增加前臂血流。
在人体前臂血管系统中,肾外V2受体介导了由DD-精氨酸血管加压素或高剂量精氨酸血管加压素诱导的血管舒张,而这些受体对于精氨酸血管加压素诱导的血管收缩并非必需。DD-精氨酸血管加压素诱导的血管舒张似乎主要由内皮一氧化氮释放以外的机制介导,而精氨酸血管加压素诱导的血管舒张似乎仅涉及一氧化氮释放。