Polonia J, Santos A R, Gama G M, Barros H
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Institute for Pharmacology and Therapy, Porto, Portugal.
J Hypertens. 1995 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1738-41.
To determine the accuracy of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, using the relationship between night-time and daytime values, in diagnosing secondary hypertension.
A prospective study was performed in a referred population of 402 hypertensive patients (clinic systolic/diastolic blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg). The ambulatory monitoring data included 24-h mean, awake (daytime) and sleeping (night-time) values. Secondary hypertension was diagnosed by standard procedures. To describe the accuracy of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, receiver-operator characteristic curves were constructed, using sensitivity and specificity values for deciles of the distribution of overnight blood pressure falls (absolute and percentage). Measurements included the fall in nocturnal blood pressure, sensitivity (the percentage of those with secondary hypertension who were classified as non-dippers), specificity (the percentage of non-secondary hypertensives who were classified as dippers) and predictive values of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
On average, overnight systolic/diastolic blood pressure fell in primary hypertensives (n = 290) by 20/18 mmHg (13%/19%), in white-coat hypertensives (n = 65, daytime ambulatory blood pressure <135/87 mmHg) by 17/15 mmHg (13%/19%) and in patients with secondary hypertension (n = 47, renal/renovascular and endocrine forms) by 13/11 mmHg (9%/12%). From receiver-operator characteristic curves, the nocturnal blood pressure fall of 15 mmHg showed the highest accuracy, with a sensitivity/specificity of 61%/69% (systolic) and 75%/62% (diastolic) whereas 10% (systolic) and 15% (diastolic) nocturnal falls had a sensitivity/specificity of 62%/74% (systolic) and 62%/70% (diastolic). The ambulatory blood pressure data had a high (>93%) negative predictive value for secondary hypertension.
Secondary hypertension is associated with a blunted nocturnal fall in blood pressure. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data are not critically important for the diagnosis and screening of secondary hypertension but may be helpful in excluding it.
利用夜间与日间血压值之间的关系,确定24小时动态血压监测在诊断继发性高血压方面的准确性。
对402例高血压患者(诊室收缩压/舒张压>140/90 mmHg)的转诊人群进行了一项前瞻性研究。动态监测数据包括24小时平均值、清醒(日间)和睡眠(夜间)值。通过标准程序诊断继发性高血压。为描述动态血压监测的准确性,构建了受试者工作特征曲线,使用夜间血压下降分布(绝对值和百分比)十分位数的敏感性和特异性值。测量指标包括夜间血压下降、敏感性(被归类为非勺型血压的继发性高血压患者的百分比)、特异性(被归类为勺型血压的非继发性高血压患者的百分比)以及动态血压监测的预测值。
原发性高血压患者(n = 290)夜间收缩压/舒张压平均下降20/18 mmHg(13%/19%),白大衣高血压患者(n = 65,日间动态血压<135/87 mmHg)下降17/15 mmHg(13%/19%),继发性高血压患者(n = 47,肾脏/肾血管性和内分泌型)下降13/11 mmHg(9%/12%)。根据受试者工作特征曲线,夜间血压下降15 mmHg显示出最高的准确性,收缩压/舒张压的敏感性/特异性为61%/69%和75%/62%,而夜间下降10%(收缩压)和15%(舒张压)时,敏感性/特异性为62%/74%(收缩压)和62%/70%(舒张压)。动态血压数据对继发性高血压具有较高(>93%)的阴性预测值。
继发性高血压与夜间血压下降减弱有关。动态血压监测数据对继发性高血压的诊断和筛查并非至关重要,但可能有助于排除继发性高血压。