Suppr超能文献

移动电话与单导联VDD起搏器之间存在相互作用的风险吗?

Is there a risk for interaction between mobile phones and single lead VDD pacemakers?

作者信息

Nowak B, Rosocha S, Zellerhoff C, Liebrich A, Himmrich E, Voigtländer T, Meyer J

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Oct;19(10):1447-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x.

Abstract

Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV block. We evaluated 31 patients with three types of single lead VDD pacemakers: 12 Unity, 292-07 (Intermedics, Inc.); 10 Thera VDD, 8948 or 8968i (Medtronic, Inc.); and 9 Saphir 600 (Vitatron, Inc.) for interference from a cellular mobile phone with a power of 2 W (D-net). For this purpose, atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings were programmed to their most sensitive values (A: 0.1-0.25 mV; V: 1.0 mV) and ventricular sensing was programmed to unipolar. With the ECG continuously monitored, the phone's extendable antenna was brought in direct contact with the patient's skin at the right sternal border, with the tip of the antenna in skin contact just below the clavicle, within 5 cm of the pacemaker connector. Then multiple phases of phone calls were performed, and the effects on the pacemakers recorded. In our group of patients with three different types of single lead VDD pacemakers, no interference could be detected using a 2-W mobile phone in the digital D-net. The programmed values remained unchanged after the interference test. Therefore, the risk of interference seems to be low for the VDD pacemakers tested, although our study design does not allow to entirely exclude the possibility of interference from a mobile phone.

摘要

移动电话可能会干扰起搏器。单腔VDD起搏器患者可能面临特殊风险,因为心房感知灵敏度通常被设定为较低(高灵敏度)阈值,且由于潜在的高度房室传导阻滞,大多数患者依赖起搏器。我们评估了31例使用三种单腔VDD起搏器的患者:12例使用Unity 292-07(Intermedics公司);10例使用Thera VDD 8948或8968i(美敦力公司);9例使用Saphir 600(Vitatron公司),以检测功率为2W的蜂窝移动电话(D-net)产生的干扰。为此,将心房和心室感知灵敏度设置为最敏感值(A:0.1 - 0.25 mV;V:1.0 mV),并将心室感知设置为单极。持续监测心电图的同时,将手机可拉伸天线直接接触患者右胸骨旁的皮肤,天线尖端在锁骨下方与皮肤接触,距离起搏器连接器5cm以内。然后进行多个阶段的通话,并记录对起搏器的影响。在我们这组使用三种不同类型单腔VDD起搏器的患者中,在数字D-net网络中使用2W移动电话未检测到干扰。干扰测试后设定值保持不变。因此,对于所测试的VDD起搏器,干扰风险似乎较低,尽管我们的研究设计不能完全排除移动电话干扰的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验