Suppr超能文献

米那普明与阿米替林抗抑郁作用、不良反应及心脏效应的双盲对照研究

Double-blind comparative study of the antidepressant, unwanted and cardiac effects of minaprine and amitriptyline.

作者信息

Edwards J G, Dinan T G, Waller D G, Greentree S G

机构信息

University Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Oct;42(4):491-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.43814.x.

Abstract
  1. A double-blind, multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of minaprine and amitriptyline in patients with major depression was carried out. Five hundred and thirty-one patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either minaprine 100 mg, 200 mg or 300 mg day-1 or with amitriptyline 150 mg day-1 (75 mg during the first week). The medication was administered for 6 weeks. 2. Efficacy was assessed using the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HDRS), the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) and visual analogue assessments of depression carried out by both the investigators and patients. Unwanted effects were assessed by a questionnaire and spontaneous reporting. In a subgroup of patients cardiovascular effects were investigated by high speed ECG and systolic time intervals. 3. Patients in each treatment group showed a significant clinical improvement (P < 0.01) from baseline. The mean HDRS and MADRS scores adjusted for baseline differences, showed significantly less improvement in the minaprine 100 mg once daily (P < 0.01) and the minaprine 300 mg daily (P < 0.01) groups than in the amitriptyline group at both week 4 and week 6. The MADRS score at week 4 suggested that 200 mg day-1 minaprine was less effective than amitriptyline (P < 0.05), but there was no difference between the two groups at week 6 on either the HDRS or the MADRS. 4. Both drugs were well tolerated and there were no significant differences between treatment groups in any of the safety and tolerance assessments. In the ECG, amitriptyline produced a significant increase in the heart rate and PR interval while minaprine had no effect on electrocardiographic measurements. Neither drug produced changes in the systolic time intervals.
摘要
  1. 开展了一项双盲、多中心研究,比较米那普明和阿米替林对重度抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性。531名患者被随机分配接受以下治疗:米那普明每日100毫克、200毫克或300毫克,或阿米替林每日150毫克(第一周75毫克)。药物治疗持续6周。

  2. 使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)以及研究人员和患者进行的抑郁视觉模拟评估来评估疗效。通过问卷调查和自发报告来评估不良反应。在一组患者中,通过高速心电图和收缩期时间间期研究心血管效应。

  3. 每个治疗组的患者与基线相比均有显著的临床改善(P < 0.01)。经基线差异调整后的HDRS和MADRS平均得分显示,在第4周和第6周时,每日一次100毫克米那普明组(P < 0.01)和每日300毫克米那普明组(P < 0.01)的改善程度明显低于阿米替林组。第4周时的MADRS评分表明,每日200毫克米那普明的疗效低于阿米替林(P < 0.05),但在第6周时,两组在HDRS或MADRS上均无差异。

  4. 两种药物耐受性良好,在任何安全性和耐受性评估中,治疗组之间均无显著差异。在心电图方面,阿米替林使心率和PR间期显著增加,而米那普明对心电图测量无影响。两种药物均未引起收缩期时间间期的变化。

相似文献

8
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed dose trial of minaprine in patients with major depression.
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1989 Jul;22(4):137-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014596.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验