CDep Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Ingelheim, Germany
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;72(8):1086-94. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05723blu. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
To assess whether hospitalized patients with severe depression and potential suicidal ideation/behavior have earlier and better response to duloxetine 120 mg daily than 60 mg daily.
Adults from 34 sites in 4 countries with severe major depressive disorder, defined by DSM-IV criteria, who were demonstrating Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores ≥ 30, 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-6) scores ≥ 12, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) ≥ 4 and hospitalized ≥ 2 weeks underwent double-blind treatment with either duloxetine 60 mg (n = 167) or 120 mg (n = 171) daily for 8 weeks. Patients treated with 60 mg/d who did not respond had their doses titrated up to 120 mg/d. Primary outcome was the difference in baseline to week 4 change in MADRS scores between the groups. Secondary outcomes were baseline to week 8 changes in MADRS and HDRS-6 scores, response and remission, CGI-S scores, CGI-Improvement scores, Patient Global Impressions-Improvement, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores, and Reasons For Living inventory results. Safety was also assessed. The study was conducted between February 9, 2007, and August 26, 2008.
There was no significant difference in mean baseline to week 4 MADRS score change between the 60-mg (-20.1) and 120-mg (-19.9) groups (P = .88). At week 4, 96/166 (60 mg) and 106/170 (120 mg) patients responded and maintained responses at week 8 by further decreasing mean MADRS scores to 5.8 (60 mg) and 5.6 (120 mg). At week 8, 226/336 (67.3%) patients achieved remission, with no difference demonstrated between groups. Most secondary efficacy measures were significantly reduced from baseline to week 8 within each group and did not differ between groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events observed with > 10% frequency in both groups were headache and nausea.
Duloxetine 60-mg and 120-mg doses were equally effective and demonstrated no significant differences in treating severe depressive symptoms in hospitalized patients. The safety and tolerability profile of duloxetine in both dosages did not differ and was similar to those reported in previous duloxetine studies.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00422162.
评估在患有严重抑郁症和潜在自杀意念/行为的住院患者中,与每日 60 毫克相比,每日 120 毫克度洛西汀是否能更早、更好地起效。
来自 4 个国家 34 个地点的患有严重抑郁症的成年人,根据 DSM-IV 标准定义,他们的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分≥30,6 项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS-6)评分≥12,临床总体印象-严重程度量表(CGI-S)≥4,住院时间≥2 周,接受度洛西汀 60 毫克(n=167)或 120 毫克(n=171)每日双盲治疗 8 周。每日接受 60 毫克治疗但未应答的患者,其剂量增至 120 毫克/天。主要结局为两组之间基线至第 4 周 MADRS 评分变化的差异。次要结局为基线至第 8 周 MADRS 和 HDRS-6 评分的变化、应答和缓解、CGI-S 评分、CGI-改善评分、患者总体印象-改善、汉密尔顿焦虑量表评分和生存原因清单结果。还评估了安全性。该研究于 2007 年 2 月 9 日至 2008 年 8 月 26 日进行。
60 毫克(-20.1)和 120 毫克(-19.9)组之间,从基线到第 4 周的平均 MADRS 评分变化无显著差异(P=0.88)。第 4 周时,166 名患者中的 96 名(60 毫克)和 170 名患者中的 106 名(120 毫克)应答,并且通过进一步将平均 MADRS 评分降至 5.8(60 毫克)和 5.6(120 毫克),在第 8 周时保持了应答。第 8 周时,336 名患者中的 226 名(67.3%)达到缓解,两组之间无差异。每个组内的大多数次要疗效指标均从基线显著降低至第 8 周,且组间无差异。两组中均有超过 10%的患者出现频率较高的治疗中出现的不良事件,分别为头痛和恶心。
度洛西汀 60 毫克和 120 毫克剂量同样有效,在治疗住院严重抑郁症状方面未显示出显著差异。度洛西汀在两种剂量下的安全性和耐受性特征无差异,且与以前度洛西汀研究报告的相似。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00422162。