Nawrocki S J, Randle Y H, Vodkin M H, Siegel J P, Novak R J
Harris County Mosquito Control District, Houston, TX 77054, USA.
J Med Entomol. 1996 Jan;33(1):123-7. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/33.1.123.
A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) was compared with a tissue culture assay (TC) and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) in mosquito pools. Overall, 1,725 mosquito pools with a low viral prevalence (3.3%-5.0%) were tested. The comparison of the EIA to TC showed that the EIA was 0.947 sensitive, 0.988 specific, and 0.987 accurate. Comparison of RT-PCR to TC showed that the RT-PCR was 0.947 sensitive, 0.980 specific, and 0.979 accurate. Comparison of the RT-PCR to EIA showed that the RT-PCR was 0.878 sensitive, 0.987 specific, and 0.982 accurate. Because of speed, accuracy, and cost, either the RT-PCR or the EIA is recommended as the primary screen. RT-PCR has an advantage over EIA, because the amplified product contains sequence information which can confirm its identity. TC, EIA, or both can be applied as a 2nd assay for the confirmation of samples suspected as positives by the RT-PCR.
为检测蚊虫样本中圣路易斯脑炎病毒(SLEV),对逆转录聚合酶链反应检测法(RT-PCR)、组织培养检测法(TC)和酶免疫检测法(EIA)进行了比较。总体而言,共检测了1725份病毒流行率较低(3.3%-5.0%)的蚊虫样本。EIA与TC的比较结果显示,EIA的灵敏度为0.947,特异性为0.988,准确率为0.987。RT-PCR与TC的比较结果显示,RT-PCR的灵敏度为0.947,特异性为0.980,准确率为0.979。RT-PCR与EIA的比较结果显示,RT-PCR的灵敏度为0.878,特异性为0.987,准确率为0.982。鉴于速度、准确性和成本,推荐将RT-PCR或EIA作为主要筛查方法。RT-PCR优于EIA,因为扩增产物包含可确认其身份的序列信息。TC、EIA或两者均可作为第二种检测方法,用于确认RT-PCR检测疑似阳性的样本。