• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用传统“金”质和塑料圆柱体制作、修整及抛光程序对假体预载的影响。

Effects of fabrication, finishing, and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional "gold' and plastic cylinders.

作者信息

Carr A B, Brunski J B, Hurley E

机构信息

Ohio State University, College of Dentistry, Columbus, USA.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Sep-Oct;11(5):589-98.

PMID:8908856
Abstract

This study reviews fundamental concepts related to the use of screws and presents data describing the effect of fabrication, finishing, and polishing procedures on as-received preload for implant cylinders. Specifically, this study measured and compared preload produced when using as-received gold cylinders (the reference or gold standard), and cast cylinders produced from premade gold and plastic cylinders in the as-cast condition and following postcast finishing and polishing manipulations. The results reveal that preload in the gold screw-gold cylinder-abutment joint can be affected by the casting process, and that the choice of cylinder type, casting alloy, investment, and finishing/polishing technique may affect the resultant preload as compared to as-received joint conditions. The data from this study indicate that when plastic patterns are used as part of the framework, finishing and polishing of implant cylinder components should provide an increased preload compared to no such manipulations. Also, if maximum preload is desired, the use of premade metal cylinders offers an advantage over plastic patterns in both preload magnitude and precision.

摘要

本研究回顾了与螺钉使用相关的基本概念,并给出了描述制作、修整和抛光程序对植入圆柱体初始预紧力影响的数据。具体而言,本研究测量并比较了使用初始状态的金圆柱体(参考物或金标准)以及由预制金圆柱体和塑料圆柱体在铸态以及铸后修整和抛光操作后制成的铸造圆柱体时产生的预紧力。结果表明,金螺钉 - 金圆柱体 - 基台接头中的预紧力会受到铸造过程的影响,并且与初始接头条件相比,圆柱体类型、铸造合金、包埋料以及修整/抛光技术的选择可能会影响最终的预紧力。本研究的数据表明,当使用塑料铸型作为框架的一部分时,与不进行此类操作相比,植入圆柱体部件的修整和抛光应能提供更大的预紧力。此外,如果需要最大预紧力,在预紧力大小和精度方面,使用预制金属圆柱体比使用塑料铸型更具优势。

相似文献

1
Effects of fabrication, finishing, and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional "gold' and plastic cylinders.使用传统“金”质和塑料圆柱体制作、修整及抛光程序对假体预载的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Sep-Oct;11(5):589-98.
2
Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.四种不同螺钉材料和表面的种植体基台螺钉旋转及预紧力
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jul;86(1):24-32. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.116230.
3
Characterization of noble metal implant cylinders: as-received cylinders and cast interfaces with noble metal alloys.贵金属植入圆柱体的表征:接收状态的圆柱体以及与贵金属合金的铸造界面。
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Jan;75(1):77-85. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90422-9.
4
In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.用于粘结固位种植体支持的局部义齿的铸造支架体外垂直不匹配评估。
J Dent. 2009 Jan;37(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
5
Fabricating a nonrotational angulated abutment for a single-tooth prosthesis.为单颗牙修复体制作非旋转角度基台。
Implant Dent. 2009 Dec;18(6):486-91. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181b8e40e.
6
Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.金色假体固定螺钉的预紧力损失与时间的关系。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Jan-Feb;19(1):124-32.
7
The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.种植体基台的螺丝通道与粘结固位修复体接合的效果。
J Prosthodont. 2009 Apr;18(3):245-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00408.x. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
8
Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.7种六角形顶端基台系统的种植体-基台螺丝连接预紧力
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 May-Jun;16(3):367-77.
9
Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures.由铸态金属和陶瓷贴面超结构引起的静态种植体负荷。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Apr;93(4):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.006.
10
Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.种植体支架的适配性:两种制作技术的体外比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Mar;89(3):256-60. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.40.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging vs. Non-Engaging Abutments: An In Vitro Study Evaluating Changes in Microgap and Screw Morphology.功能性基台与非功能性基台:一项评估微间隙和螺钉形态变化的体外研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;12(8):265. doi: 10.3390/dj12080265.
2
Evaluation and comparison of vertical marginal fit of three different types of multiunit screw-retained framework fabricated for an implant-supported prosthesis - An study.三种不同类型的种植体支持式修复体的多单位螺丝固位框架的垂直边缘适合性评估与比较-一项 研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jul-Sep;22(3):240-248. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_28_22.
3
Effect of dynamic cyclic loading on screw loosening of retightened versus new abutment screw in both narrow and standard implants (in-vitro study).
动态循环加载对窄型和标准型种植体中重新拧紧的基台螺钉与新基台螺钉松动的影响(体外研究)。
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Jul 28;6(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00229-3.
4
Nanoparticles used in dentistry: A review.牙科领域使用的纳米颗粒:综述。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018 Jan-Apr;8(1):58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
5
Leakage evaluation of original and compatible implant-abutment connections: In vitro study using Rhodamine B.原装与兼容种植体-基台连接的渗漏评估:使用罗丹明B的体外研究
J Dent Biomech. 2014 Aug 11;5:1758736014547143. doi: 10.1177/1758736014547143. eCollection 2014.
6
In vitro evaluation of leakage at implant-abutment connection of three implant systems having the same prosthetic interface using rhodamine B.使用罗丹明B对具有相同修复界面的三种种植系统的种植体-基台连接部位进行体外渗漏评估。
Int J Dent. 2014;2014:351263. doi: 10.1155/2014/351263. Epub 2014 May 11.
7
Effect of axial loads on implant-supported partial fixed prostheses by strain gauge analysis.应变片分析轴向载荷对种植体支持的局部固定义齿的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;19(6):610-5. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000600011.
8
Effect of cyclic load on vertical misfit of prefabricated and cast implant single abutment.循环载荷对预制和铸造种植体单基台垂直不匹配的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Jan-Feb;19(1):16-21. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000100005.
9
Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implant-abutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis.三元件修复体中不同类型种植体-基台连接方式的机加工和塑料外冠:应变片对比分析。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 May-Jun;18(3):225-30. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000300005.
10
Preload and torque removal evaluation of three different abutment screws for single standing implant restorations.单颗种植体修复中三种不同基台螺钉的预紧力和扭矩去除评估
J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):55-8. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572008000100011.