Ashe M J, Tripp G A, Eichmiller F C, George L A, Meiers J C
Comprehensive Dentistry Department, Naval Dental School, Bethesda, Md, USA.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 Oct;127(10):1495-500. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0059.
The authors compared the effectiveness of seven polishing methods on glass-ceramic insert-composite restorations placed in plastic resin squares. The polishing methods used carbide dental finishing burs and diamond polishing paste, diamond abrasive finishing burs and diamond polishing paste, diamond abrasive finishing burs and composite resin finishing disks, diamond abrasive finishing burs and composite resin polishing points, diamond abrasive finishing burs only, diamond abrasive finishing burs followed by resin impregnated disks and an aluminum oxide polishing abrasive paste, and diamond abrasive finishing burs followed by diamond polishing paste. All systems achieved comparable smoothness except the carbide finishing burs, which damaged the insert-composite margin.
作者比较了七种抛光方法对置于塑料树脂方块中的玻璃陶瓷嵌体-复合树脂修复体的效果。所使用的抛光方法包括:硬质合金牙科精修车针和金刚石抛光膏、金刚石磨料精修车针和金刚石抛光膏、金刚石磨料精修车针和复合树脂精修盘、金刚石磨料精修车针和复合树脂抛光盘、仅使用金刚石磨料精修车针、金刚石磨料精修车针后接树脂浸渍盘和氧化铝抛光磨料膏,以及金刚石磨料精修车针后接金刚石抛光膏。除了硬质合金精修车针会损坏嵌体-复合树脂边缘外,所有系统都达到了相当的光滑度。