Bunnting B G, Wessels W H, Lasich A J, Pillay B
University of Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Med Law. 1996;15(2):241-7.
The ability of twenty items to separate malingering from mental illness is tested. The items were obtained from the literature and clinical experience. The study used an experimental, cross-sectional design which compared fifty malingering African patients and a control group of fifty African State Presidents' Detainees. The chi-square test and the Fisher's exact test were used to assess statistical significance. The effectiveness of these items was assessed by calculating their sensitivity, specificity, false positives and negatives and positive and negative predictive values. Seventeen items showed statistical significance. Eleven items had high positive predictive values mostly above 90% with four items scoring 100%. These diagnosed malingering effectively. Another six items had high negative predictive values mainly above 90%. These diagnosed mental illness directly and excluded malingering effectively. The study proved that seventeen items can scientifically and effectively separate mental illness from malingering.
对20个项目区分诈病与精神疾病的能力进行了测试。这些项目来自文献和临床经验。该研究采用了实验性横断面设计,比较了50名诈病的非洲患者和50名非洲国家总统被拘留者组成的对照组。采用卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验来评估统计学显著性。通过计算这些项目的敏感性、特异性、假阳性和假阴性以及阳性和阴性预测值来评估其有效性。17个项目具有统计学显著性。11个项目具有较高的阳性预测值,大多高于90%,其中4个项目得分为100%。这些项目能有效诊断诈病。另外6个项目具有较高的阴性预测值,主要高于90%。这些项目能直接诊断精神疾病并有效排除诈病。该研究证明,17个项目能够科学有效地将精神疾病与诈病区分开来。