Allan E R, Alpert M, Sison C E, Citrome L, Laury G, Berman I
Franklin Delano Roosevelt Veterans Affairs Hospital, Montrose, NY 10548, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;57(10):455-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v57n1003.
This study assessed the safety and efficacy of nadolol 120 mg/day compared with placebo, when administered adjunctively to neuroleptic in a group of acutely aggressive schizophrenic patients.
Thirty-four male patients enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The subjects were evaluated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Simpson Angus Neurologic Rating Scale for extrapyramidal effects. The total BPRS score as well as three factors, thought disturbance, hostility, and activation, was analyzed.
Compared with those who received placebo, the patients taking nadolol showed significant improvement on total BPRS score, particularly on the thought disturbance and activation factors, after the first treatment week (p = .05). By the end of the second treatment week, the patients taking placebo also began to show improvement, and the group differences were no longer significant. The patients treated with nadolol showed significantly more improvement on Simpson-Angus scores than those who received placebo (p = .03). However, there was no significant correlation between BPRS and Simpson-Angus changes. In the nadolol group, patients with and without akathisia showed no significant difference in their BPRS scores.
These findings suggest that adjunctive nadolol may be useful in the treatment of acutely aggressive schizophrenic patients by inducing a more rapid and consistent decrease of overall psychiatric symptoms and by reducing the extrapyramidal effects. Our results raise the possibility that the mechanism of action of nadolol on psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenic patients may be different from the mechanism of improvement of neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms and akathisia. Nadolol may be a helpful adjunctive treatment for schizophrenic patients in general and not just for those with a high hostility level.
本研究评估了在一组急性攻击性精神分裂症患者中,与安慰剂相比,每天服用120毫克纳多洛尔并辅助使用抗精神病药物时的安全性和有效性。
34名男性患者参与了这项双盲、安慰剂对照试验。使用简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)和辛普森·安格斯神经评定量表评估锥体外系反应。分析了BPRS总分以及思维紊乱、敌意和激活这三个因子。
与接受安慰剂的患者相比,服用纳多洛尔的患者在首个治疗周后BPRS总分有显著改善,尤其是在思维紊乱和激活因子方面(p = 0.05)。到第二个治疗周末,服用安慰剂的患者也开始出现改善,组间差异不再显著。服用纳多洛尔治疗的患者在辛普森·安格斯评分上的改善显著多于接受安慰剂的患者(p = 0.03)。然而,BPRS变化与辛普森·安格斯变化之间没有显著相关性。在纳多洛尔组中,有静坐不能和无静坐不能的患者在BPRS评分上没有显著差异。
这些发现表明,辅助使用纳多洛尔可能有助于治疗急性攻击性精神分裂症患者,它能更快速且持续地减轻整体精神症状,并减少锥体外系反应。我们的结果提出了一种可能性,即纳多洛尔对精神分裂症患者精神症状的作用机制可能不同于其改善抗精神病药物所致锥体外系症状和静坐不能的机制。一般而言,纳多洛尔可能是精神分裂症患者有益的辅助治疗药物,而不仅仅适用于敌意水平高的患者。