• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状阻生智齿的处理:一项多中心比较研究

Management of asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth: a multicentre comparison.

作者信息

Singh H, Lee K, Ayoub A F

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Oct;34(5):389-93. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(96)90093-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0266-4356(96)90093-5
PMID:8909728
Abstract

This study was carried out to assess the opinions of clinicians (general practitioners and oral and maxillofacial surgeons) regarding the management of unerupted Mandibular Asymptomatic Impacted Wisdom Teeth (MAIWT) at two centres: Glasgow Dental Hospital and School and its affiliated institutions and Prince Philip Dental Hospital and its affiliated institutions in Hong Kong. Twenty four clinicians, twelve from each centre, of whom six were oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMS) and six general dental practitioners (GDP) participated in this investigation. The orthopantomographs of 21 cases were used in the study and were examined by each clinician to investigate the management of unerupted MAIWT was recorded using a custom written questionnaire. Hong Kong clinicians showed a greater tendency towards extraction of MAIWT in comparison to Glasgow clinicians. The difference was statistically significant. The data indicates a significant difference between Hong Kong OMS and Glasgow OMS and between Hong Kong OMS and Hong Kong GDP, with Hong Kong OMS showing a greater tendency towards extraction. This study proved the diversity of opinions in one of the most common dento-alveolar procedures. The dilemma to extract or retain MAIWT still exists and controversy is likely to remain. The difference in the rationale of management regimes between the centres are discussed. The medico-legal and financial issues are investigated.

摘要

本研究旨在评估两个中心(格拉斯哥牙科医院及学校及其附属机构,以及香港菲腊亲王牙科医院及其附属机构)的临床医生(全科医生和口腔颌面外科医生)对未萌出的下颌无症状阻生智齿(MAIWT)治疗的看法。24名临床医生参与了此次调查,其中12名来自每个中心,包括6名口腔颌面外科医生(OMS)和6名普通牙科医生(GDP)。研究中使用了21例病例的曲面断层片,每位临床医生对其进行检查,并通过一份定制的问卷记录对未萌出的MAIWT的治疗情况。与格拉斯哥的临床医生相比,香港的临床医生更倾向于拔除MAIWT。这种差异具有统计学意义。数据表明,香港的OMS与格拉斯哥的OMS之间,以及香港的OMS与香港的GDP之间存在显著差异,香港的OMS更倾向于拔除。本研究证明了在最常见的牙槽手术之一中存在意见的多样性。拔除或保留MAIWT的两难困境仍然存在,争议可能会持续。讨论了两个中心在治疗方案依据上的差异。还对医疗法律和财务问题进行了调查。

相似文献

1
Management of asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth: a multicentre comparison.无症状阻生智齿的处理:一项多中心比较研究
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Oct;34(5):389-93. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(96)90093-5.
2
[Incision of the third molar in the Netherlands. Incision tech-niques for the removal of impacted third molars in the mandible.].[荷兰的第三磨牙切开术。下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除的切开技术。]
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2017 Dec;124(12):639-643. doi: 10.5177/ntvt.2017.12.17108.
3
Dentists' decisions on prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars: a 10-year follow-up study.牙医关于预防性拔除下颌第三磨牙的决策:一项为期10年的随访研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;29(4):308-14. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290411.x.
4
Lower third molar treatment planning ability of general dental practitioners and oral maxillofacial surgeons using receiver operating characteristics methodology.
Br Dent J. 1996;181(11-12):411-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809278.
5
Perception of the need for removal of impacted third molars by general dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons.普通牙医以及口腔颌面外科医生对拔除阻生第三磨牙必要性的认知。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Jul;52(7):681-6; discussion 686-7. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90478-2.
6
Incidence of symptoms in previously symptom-free impacted lower third molars assessed in general dental practice.在普通牙科诊所评估的既往无症状的下颌阻生第三磨牙的症状发生率。
Br Dent J. 2009 Sep 12;207(5):E10; discussion 218-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.804. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
7
The mandibular third molar. Dentists' judgment in the removal of asymptomatic molars.
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1996;114:1-48.
8
Dentists' judgment strategies on prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars.
J Dent Res. 2000 Dec;79(12):1989-95. doi: 10.1177/00220345000790121101.
9
Judgement of removal of asymptomatic mandibular third molars: influence of position, degree of impaction, and patient's age.
Acta Odontol Scand. 1996 Dec;54(6):348-54. doi: 10.3109/00016359609003550.
10
Asymptomatic mandibular third molars: oral surgeons' judgment of the need for extraction.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Apr;50(4):329-33. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90390-l.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician-related factors behind the decision to extract an asymptomatic lower third molar. A cross-sectional study based on Spanish and Portuguese dentists.拔除无症状下颌第三磨牙决策背后的临床医生相关因素。一项基于西班牙和葡萄牙牙医的横断面研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Sep 1;22(5):e609-e615. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21634.
2
Decision making in third molar surgery: a survey of Brazilian oral and maxillofacial surgeons.第三磨牙手术中的决策:对巴西口腔颌面外科医生的一项调查。
Int Dent J. 2015 Aug;65(4):169-77. doi: 10.1111/idj.12165. Epub 2015 Apr 16.