Suppr超能文献

硅胶网敷料与石蜡油纱布敷料用于植皮部位的对比研究。

A comparative study of silicone net dressing and paraffin gauze dressing in skin-grafted sites.

作者信息

Platt A J, Phipps A, Judkins K

机构信息

Yorkshire Burn Centre, Pinderfields General Hospital, Wakefield, UK.

出版信息

Burns. 1996 Nov;22(7):543-5. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(96)00035-6.

Abstract

This prospective randomized study has compared paraffin gauze dressing (n = 19) with silicone net dressing (Mepitel, n = 19) applied as the first layer to newly grafted burn wounds. At the first postoperative dressing visual analogue pain scores were greater in the paraffin gauze group (mean 4.4) than in the silicone net group (mean 1.4, P < 0.01). All patients in the paraffin gauze group experienced some degree of pain on dressing removal, whereas 53 per cent of patients in the silicone net group experienced no pain. Overall graft take was similar in both groups, (silicone net mean 95.7 per cent; paraffin gauze mean 94.3 per cent). Dressings were harder to remove in the paraffin gauze group as assessed by a simple scoring system (P < 0.001). In conclusion silicone net dressing confers advantages over conventional paraffin gauze, especially in reducing patient discomfort during dressing changes.

摘要

这项前瞻性随机研究比较了作为第一层敷料应用于新移植烧伤创面的石蜡纱布敷料(n = 19)和硅胶网敷料(美皮康,n = 19)。术后首次换药时,石蜡纱布组的视觉模拟疼痛评分(平均4.4)高于硅胶网组(平均1.4,P < 0.01)。石蜡纱布组所有患者在去除敷料时都经历了一定程度的疼痛,而硅胶网组53%的患者没有疼痛。两组的总体植皮成活率相似(硅胶网平均95.7%;石蜡纱布平均94.3%)。通过一个简单的评分系统评估,石蜡纱布组的敷料更难去除(P < 0.001)。总之,硅胶网敷料比传统石蜡纱布具有优势,尤其是在减少换药过程中患者的不适方面。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验