Boos J, Werber G, Ahlke E, Schulze-Westhoff P, Nowak-Göttl U, Würthwein G, Verspohl E J, Ritter J, Jürgens H
Department of Paediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Münster, Germany.
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Aug;32A(9):1544-50. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00131-1.
The antileukaemic enzyme L-asparaginase is used to achieve the greatest possible reduction in blood levels of the amino acid asparagine, an essential factor for the growth of leukaemic blasts. There are two main sources of the enzyme, E. coli and Erwinia. Faced with increasing reports of treatment complications, we established a programme to monitor enzyme activity and asparagine levels in serum, in children receiving treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Trough asparagine and asparaginase levels were measured in 49 children on induction treatment with different E. coli preparations (Asparaginase medac, Crasnitin) and in 52 children on re-induction (Asparaginase medac, Crasnitin, and, in the event of allergic reactions, Erwinase) just prior to each sequential application of 10000 U/m2 of asparaginase. Measurements were made by an enzyme assay and an HPLC method. During induction, both Escherichia coli preparations induced the desired reduction in asparagine, but the asparaginase activity with Asparaginase medac was significantly higher than with Crasnitin (median of trough levels 475 versus 74 U/l). Under re-induction treatment (median, Asparaginase medac 528 U/l, Crasnitin 49 U/l, and Erwinase < 20 U/l) complete asparagine depletion was recorded on day 3 in more than 90% of Asparaginase medac samples, more than 60% of Crasnitin samples and in 26% of Erwinase samples. The latter two groups included some children with unchanged asparagine levels and no measurable enzyme activity. Different asparaginase preparations are not readily interchangeable. When Asparaginase medac is used instead of Crasnitin, and identical dose will be associated with significantly higher enzyme activity, well above the level required for complete asparagine depletion. Clinical studies will need to specify both the preparation and the dose to be used. When substitution of an alternative drug is mandatory owing to allergic reactions, monitoring is advisable.
抗白血病酶L-天冬酰胺酶用于尽可能最大程度地降低氨基酸天冬酰胺的血液水平,天冬酰胺是白血病原始细胞生长的一个关键因素。该酶有两个主要来源,即大肠杆菌和欧文氏菌。面对越来越多的治疗并发症报告,我们制定了一个项目,以监测接受急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)和非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)治疗的儿童血清中的酶活性和天冬酰胺水平。在49例接受不同大肠杆菌制剂(美达施天冬酰胺酶、克拉斯尼丁)诱导治疗的儿童以及52例接受再诱导治疗(美达施天冬酰胺酶、克拉斯尼丁,如发生过敏反应则使用欧文酶)的儿童中,在每次连续应用10000 U/m²天冬酰胺酶之前,测量谷值天冬酰胺和天冬酰胺酶水平。测量采用酶分析法和高效液相色谱法。在诱导治疗期间,两种大肠杆菌制剂均能使天冬酰胺水平降至预期水平,但美达施天冬酰胺酶的天冬酰胺酶活性显著高于克拉斯尼丁(谷值水平中位数分别为475和74 U/l)。在再诱导治疗中(中位数,美达施天冬酰胺酶528 U/l,克拉斯尼丁49 U/l,欧文酶<20 U/l),在第3天,超过90%的美达施天冬酰胺酶样本、超过60%的克拉斯尼丁样本以及26%的欧文酶样本记录到天冬酰胺完全耗竭。后两组包括一些天冬酰胺水平未变且酶活性无法测量的儿童。不同的天冬酰胺酶制剂不易相互替代。当使用美达施天冬酰胺酶替代克拉斯尼丁时,相同剂量会伴有显著更高的酶活性,远高于完全耗尽天冬酰胺所需的水平。临床研究需要明确所使用的制剂和剂量。当因过敏反应而必须更换替代药物时,建议进行监测。