• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髂动脉支架置入术的并发症

Complications of iliac artery stent deployment.

作者信息

Ballard J L, Sparks S R, Taylor F C, Bergan J J, Smith D C, Bunt T J, Killeen J D

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA 92354, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1996 Oct;24(4):545-53; discussion 553-5. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70070-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70070-8
PMID:8911403
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was performed to determine the primary patency, foot salvage, and complication rates associated with iliac artery stent deployment.

METHODS

From March 1992 to May 1995, 147 iliac artery stents were deployed in 98 limbs of 72 patients for disabling claudication or limb-threatening ischemia. Procedure-related and late (> 30 days) complications, as well as adjunctive maneuvers required to correct a complication, were tabulated. Stented iliac artery cumulative primary patency and foot salvage rates were calculated with life-table analysis. Factors that impacted early complications, late complications, foot salvage rates, and stented iliac artery primary patency rates were identified with stepwise logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A procedure-related complication occurred in 19 (19.4%) limbs. Initial technical success, however, was achieved in all but three of 98 limbs (96.9%). Stented iliac artery cumulative primary patency rates were 87.6%, 61.9%, 55.3%, and foot salvage rates were 97.7%, 85.1%, 76.1%, at 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. External iliac artery stent deployment, superficial femoral artery occlusion before treatment, and single-vessel tibial runoff before treatment negatively affected stented iliac artery cumulative primary patency rates. Stented iliac artery primary patency rates were not significantly affected by age, smoking, coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, presenting symptom, early complication, number of stents deployed, type of stent deployed, or stent deployment for stenosis versus occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Limb-threatening and life-threatening complications can be associated with iliac artery stent deployment. Stented iliac artery primary patency rates are affected by distal atherosclerotic occlusive disease and the position of the deployed stent within the iliac system. Stent reconstruction of severe iliac artery occlusive disease is feasible but should be thoughtfully selected.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与髂动脉支架置入相关的初始通畅率、足部挽救率及并发症发生率。

方法

1992年3月至1995年5月,对72例患者的98条肢体置入147枚髂动脉支架,用于治疗致残性跛行或肢体威胁性缺血。将与手术相关的及晚期(>30天)并发症,以及纠正并发症所需的辅助操作制成表格。采用寿命表分析法计算髂动脉支架置入后的累积初始通畅率和足部挽救率。通过逐步逻辑回归分析确定影响早期并发症、晚期并发症、足部挽救率及髂动脉支架置入后初始通畅率的因素。

结果

19条(19.4%)肢体出现与手术相关的并发症。然而,98条肢体中除3条外其余均取得了初始技术成功(96.9%)。髂动脉支架置入后的累积初始通畅率在12个月、18个月和24个月时分别为87.6%、61.9%、55.3%,足部挽救率分别为97.7%、85.1%、76.1%。髂外动脉支架置入、治疗前股浅动脉闭塞以及治疗前单支胫动脉血流对髂动脉支架置入后的累积初始通畅率产生负面影响。髂动脉支架置入后的初始通畅率不受年龄、吸烟、冠状动脉疾病、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症、高血压、就诊症状、早期并发症、置入支架数量、置入支架类型或因狭窄与闭塞而行的支架置入的显著影响。

结论

髂动脉支架置入可能会出现肢体威胁性和生命威胁性并发症。髂动脉支架置入后的初始通畅率受远端动脉粥样硬化闭塞性疾病及置入支架在髂动脉系统中的位置影响。严重髂动脉闭塞性疾病的支架重建可行,但应谨慎选择。

相似文献

1
Complications of iliac artery stent deployment.髂动脉支架置入术的并发症
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Oct;24(4):545-53; discussion 553-5. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70070-8.
2
Long-term outcomes and predictors of iliac angioplasty with selective stenting.髂血管成形术联合选择性支架置入术的长期疗效及预测因素
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Sep;42(3):466-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.002.
3
Predictors for adverse outcome after iliac angioplasty and stenting for limb-threatening ischemia.髂血管成形术和支架置入术治疗肢体威胁性缺血后不良结局的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Sep;36(3):507-13. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.126541.
4
Iliofemoral endarterectomy associated with systematic iliac stent grafting for the treatment of severe iliofemoral occlusive disease.髂股动脉内膜切除术联合系统性髂动脉支架植入术治疗严重髂股动脉闭塞性疾病。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):406-413. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.130. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
5
Remote iliac artery endarterectomy with selective stent use at the proximal dissection zone in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D lesions.在 TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C 和 D 病变中,采用选择性支架近端夹层区的远程髂动脉内膜切除术。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Apr;69(4):1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.067. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
6
Influence of hormone replacement therapy on the outcome of iliac angioplasty and stenting.
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Feb;33(2 Suppl):S85-92. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.111667.
7
Aortoiliac stent deployment versus surgical reconstruction: analysis of outcome and cost.
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jul;28(1):94-101; discussion 101-3. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70204-6.
8
Early results of external iliac artery stenting combined with common femoral artery endarterectomy.髂外动脉支架置入术联合股总动脉内膜切除术的早期结果
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Jun;35(6):1107-13. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.124374.
9
The effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of critical limb ischemia: a 10-year experience.经皮腔内血管成形术治疗严重肢体缺血的有效性:十年经验
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Mar;41(3):423-35; discussion 435. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.11.041.
10
Iliac artery stenting versus surgical reconstruction for TASC (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus) type B and type C iliac lesions.髂动脉支架置入术与手术重建治疗跨大西洋两岸多学会共识(TASC)B型和C型髂动脉病变的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Aug;38(2):272-8. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00411-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical, structural, and morphological differences in the iliac arteries.髂动脉的机械、结构和形态差异。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024 Jul;155:106535. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106535. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
2
Toward Data-Driven Learning Healthcare Systems in Interventional Radiology: Implementation to Evaluate Venous Stent Patency.迈向介入放射学的数据驱动型学习医疗保健系统:评估静脉支架通畅性的实施。
J Digit Imaging. 2020 Feb;33(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00280-6.
3
The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment.
单纯股总动脉内膜切除术或联合血管内治疗的优势。
Vasc Specialist Int. 2018 Sep;34(3):65-71. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2018.34.3.65. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
4
Iatrogenic percutaneous vascular injuries: clinical presentation, imaging, and management.医源性经皮血管损伤:临床表现、影像学及处理
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun;32(2):108-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549375.
5
Mid-term outcomes following endovascular re-intervention for iliac artery in-stent restenosis.腔内再干预治疗髂动脉支架内再狭窄的中期结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec 1;82(7):1176-84. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24975. Epub 2013 May 25.
6
Combined common femoral artery endarterectomy with superficial femoral artery stenting plus Shuxuening Injection infusion for chronic lower extremity ischemia: 3-year results.股总动脉内膜切除术联合股浅动脉支架置入术加疏血通注射液灌注治疗慢性下肢缺血:3 年结果。
Chin J Integr Med. 2012 Jun;18(6):417-22. doi: 10.1007/s11655-012-1113-z. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
7
A newly designed nitinol stent: early clinical experience in the treatment of iliac artery stenoses and occlusions.一种新设计的镍钛诺支架:治疗髂动脉狭窄和闭塞的早期临床经验。
Korean J Radiol. 2001 Jul-Sep;2(3):145-50. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2001.2.3.145.