Suppr超能文献

笨拙的矫正。二、动觉是答案吗?

The remediation of clumsiness. II. Is kinaesthesis the answer?

作者信息

Sims K, Henderson S E, Morton J, Hulme C

机构信息

MRC Cognitive Development Unit, London, UK.

出版信息

Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996 Nov;38(11):988-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15059.x.

Abstract

The paper reports the second of two studies designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Kinaesthetic Training Programme (Laszlo and Bairstow, 1985) for children with movement difficulties. Three groups of 12 children were matched on age, IQ and sex as well as degree of kinaesthetic and motor impairment. One group received the Laszlo training, another received a training programme designed to avoid explicit reference to kinaesthesis and the third group received no training. Children receiving no intervention failed to show a change in performance. By contrast, the motor competence of both groups of treated children improved significantly. There was no advantage for the Laszlo trained group. It seems that in designing a remediation programme for clumsy children, the way that training is presented is as important as its actual content.

摘要

该论文报告了两项旨在评估动觉训练计划(拉兹洛和贝尔斯托,1985年)对有运动困难儿童有效性的研究中的第二项。三组每组12名儿童在年龄、智商、性别以及动觉和运动障碍程度上进行了匹配。一组接受拉兹洛训练,另一组接受旨在避免明确提及动觉的训练计划,第三组未接受训练。未接受干预的儿童在表现上没有变化。相比之下,两组接受治疗的儿童的运动能力都有显著提高。接受拉兹洛训练的组没有优势。似乎在为动作笨拙的儿童设计补救计划时,训练呈现的方式与其实际内容同样重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验