Sims K, Henderson S E, Morton J, Hulme C
MRC Cognitive Development Unit, London, UK.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996 Nov;38(11):988-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15059.x.
The paper reports the second of two studies designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Kinaesthetic Training Programme (Laszlo and Bairstow, 1985) for children with movement difficulties. Three groups of 12 children were matched on age, IQ and sex as well as degree of kinaesthetic and motor impairment. One group received the Laszlo training, another received a training programme designed to avoid explicit reference to kinaesthesis and the third group received no training. Children receiving no intervention failed to show a change in performance. By contrast, the motor competence of both groups of treated children improved significantly. There was no advantage for the Laszlo trained group. It seems that in designing a remediation programme for clumsy children, the way that training is presented is as important as its actual content.
该论文报告了两项旨在评估动觉训练计划(拉兹洛和贝尔斯托,1985年)对有运动困难儿童有效性的研究中的第二项。三组每组12名儿童在年龄、智商、性别以及动觉和运动障碍程度上进行了匹配。一组接受拉兹洛训练,另一组接受旨在避免明确提及动觉的训练计划,第三组未接受训练。未接受干预的儿童在表现上没有变化。相比之下,两组接受治疗的儿童的运动能力都有显著提高。接受拉兹洛训练的组没有优势。似乎在为动作笨拙的儿童设计补救计划时,训练呈现的方式与其实际内容同样重要。