Boden W E
Syracuse V.A. Medical Center, New York, USA.
Drugs. 1996;52 Suppl 4:20-30. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199600524-00007.
Various pharmacological strategies are currently being sought to enhance the efficacy of thrombolysis after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Apart from the use of new thrombolytic agents, novel anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs, attention has recently been focused on agents such as the calcium channel blockers (calcium antagonists) traditionally used (prior to the thrombolytic era) for secondary prevention after an AMI. In this context, although calcium channel blockers have not been definitively proven to have any benefit with regard to all-cause mortality or subsequent infarctions, diltiazem has been shown to reduce cardiac mortality, recurrent nonfatal infarction and myocardial ischaemia after non-Q-wave AMI. These benefits have been linked to the drug's effect of lowering heart rate. Since both non-Q-wave AMI and the AMI treated with thrombolytic therapy result in early reperfusion and clinical manifestations of 'incomplete infarction', and are characterised by a similar high incidence of ischaemic complications, it is plausible to hypothesise that prophylactic calcium channel blocker administration to AMI patients post-thrombolysis might decrease the cumulative occurrence of reinfarction and refractory ischaemia during long term follow-up. With this in mind, the Incomplete INfarction Trial of European Research Collaborators Evaluating Prognosis Post-Thrombolysis with Tildiem was initiated in September 1994. This represents the first prospective study to investigate the efficacy of a calcium channel blocker (long-acting diltiazem 300 mg/day) administered as adjunctive therapy with aspirin 160 mg/day in up to 920 patients with an uncomplicated first AMI receiving early thrombolytic therapy. The primary trial objective is to assess the efficacy of blinded therapy on the 6-month cumulative occurrence of a combined clinical end-point (cardiac death, recurrent non-fatal infarction, medically refractory ischaemia)-an end-point identical to that utilised in the assessment of diltiazem in non-Q-wave AMI.
目前正在探索各种药理学策略以提高急性心肌梗死(AMI)后溶栓治疗的疗效。除了使用新型溶栓剂、新型抗凝剂和抗血小板药物外,最近注意力集中在诸如钙通道阻滞剂(钙拮抗剂)这类在溶栓时代之前传统上用于AMI后二级预防的药物上。在此背景下,尽管尚未明确证明钙通道阻滞剂对全因死亡率或后续梗死有任何益处,但地尔硫䓬已被证明可降低非Q波AMI后的心脏死亡率、复发性非致命性梗死和心肌缺血。这些益处与该药物降低心率的作用有关。由于非Q波AMI和接受溶栓治疗的AMI都会导致早期再灌注和“不完全梗死”的临床表现,并且具有相似的缺血性并发症高发生率,因此可以合理推测,在溶栓后对AMI患者预防性给予钙通道阻滞剂可能会减少长期随访期间再梗死和难治性缺血的累积发生率。考虑到这一点,欧洲研究合作者评估用恬尔心进行溶栓后预后的不完全梗死试验于1994年9月启动。这是第一项前瞻性研究,旨在调查钙通道阻滞剂(长效地尔硫䓬300毫克/天)与160毫克/天阿司匹林联合作为辅助治疗,用于多达920例接受早期溶栓治疗的无并发症首次AMI患者的疗效。主要试验目标是评估盲法治疗对6个月累积发生的综合临床终点(心源性死亡、复发性非致命性梗死、药物难治性缺血)的疗效,该终点与用于评估地尔硫䓬在非Q波AMI中的终点相同。