Terashima M, Naito H, Kurosawa T, Sato Y, Tamura S
Division of Functional Diagnostic Imaging, Osaka University Medical School.
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1996 Sep;56(11):720-5.
To verify the accuracy of several algorithms used to quantitate left ventricular (LV) regional wall motion, five volunteers were examined by cine MR imaging with presaturation myocardial tagging in short-axis and 4-chamber sections. Three algorithms for the wall motion analysis, radial, centerline, and originally developed "modified-Hildreth" methods, were applied to the cine MR images, and dissociation of the end-systolic position of the tags estimated by each algorithm from the true position was examined. The modified-Hildreth method was comparable in accuracy to the other methods for estimating end-systolic tag position. Significantly worse estimation of the tag position by the three algorithms occurred in the 4-chamber section compared with the short-axis section (p < 0.001, 0.005), indicating difficulties in the wall motion analysis of "long-axis" LV images. Among the algorithms, the centerline method showed the highest accuracy of the estimation in the 4-chamber section, and the modified-Hildreth method was the best in the short-axis section. In the 4-chamber section, correction of the position of end-diastolic and end-systolic images around the luminal centroids improved the estimation (p < 0.01, 0.05). Tagging cine MR imaging was proved to be useful for determining the most suitable algorithm for quantitative wall motion analysis of LV images obtained from conventional angiocardiography and other imaging modalities.
为验证用于定量分析左心室(LV)局部壁运动的几种算法的准确性,对5名志愿者进行了短轴和四腔心切面的电影磁共振成像及预饱和心肌标记检查。将三种壁运动分析算法,即径向、中心线和最初开发的“改良希尔德雷思”方法,应用于电影磁共振图像,并检查每种算法估计的收缩末期标记位置与真实位置的偏差。改良希尔德雷思方法在估计收缩末期标记位置的准确性方面与其他方法相当。与短轴切面相比,三种算法在四腔心切面中对标记位置的估计明显更差(p < 0.001, 0.005),表明“长轴”LV图像的壁运动分析存在困难。在这些算法中,中心线方法在四腔心切面中的估计准确性最高,改良希尔德雷思方法在短轴切面中表现最佳。在四腔心切面中,围绕管腔质心校正舒张末期和收缩末期图像的位置可改善估计(p < 0.01, 0.05)。标记电影磁共振成像被证明有助于确定从传统心血管造影和其他成像模式获得的LV图像定量壁运动分析的最合适算法。