Suppr超能文献

多平面经食管超声心动图在改善二尖瓣反流严重程度评估中的应用价值。

Usefulness of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography to improve the assessment of severity of mitral regurgitation.

作者信息

Pieper E P, Hamer H P, Sluijs R A, Ravelli A C, Tijssen J G, Crijns H J, Lie K I, Visser C A

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1996 Nov 15;78(10):1132-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)90066-1.

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the accuracy of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) color Doppler measurements in comparison to monoplane or biplane measurements in estimating the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR). Multiplane TEE potentially increases diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal examinations; it is unknown if multiplane is more accurate in assessing the severity of MR than monoplane or biplane TEE. Left ventricular cineangiograms of 91 patients with MR (40 no or mild, 30 moderate, and 21 severe) were compared with systolic pulmonary venous flow reversal and transesophageal color Doppler measurements: jet area and length in the transverse and longitudinal plane, maximal and average of those 2 planes (biplane), and maximal and average of 11 different planes (multiplane). Flow reversal (16 patients) identified severe MR with a specificity of 96% and a sensitivity of 62%; these were 96% and only 10% to 43%, respectively, for color Doppler measurements. In the absence of flow reversal, multiplane maximal jet area predicted severe MR with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 75%, which were 85% and 76%, respectively, for no or mild MR; this did not differ significantly from results obtained by monoplane or biplane measurements. Color Doppler measurements of eccentric jets were not reliable for identification of severe MR. Systolic pulmonary venous flow reversal identifies 2 of 3 patients with severe MR with a high accuracy. In patients without flow reversal, multiplane color Doppler TEE is very capable of assessing MR severity, but biplane and monoplane TEE are equally accurate.

摘要

本研究旨在比较多平面经食管超声心动图(TEE)彩色多普勒测量与单平面或双平面测量在评估二尖瓣反流(MR)严重程度方面的准确性。多平面TEE可能会提高经食管检查的诊断准确性;多平面在评估MR严重程度方面是否比单平面或双平面TEE更准确尚不清楚。对91例MR患者(40例无或轻度、30例中度、21例重度)的左心室血管造影与收缩期肺静脉血流逆转及经食管彩色多普勒测量结果进行比较:横向和纵向平面的射流面积和长度、这两个平面的最大值和平均值(双平面)以及11个不同平面的最大值和平均值(多平面)。血流逆转(16例患者)诊断重度MR的特异性为96%,敏感性为62%;彩色多普勒测量的特异性和敏感性分别为96%和仅10%至43%。在无血流逆转的情况下,多平面最大射流面积诊断重度MR的敏感性为88%,特异性为75%,对于无或轻度MR,敏感性和特异性分别为85%和76%;这与单平面或双平面测量结果无显著差异。偏心射流的彩色多普勒测量对于识别重度MR并不可靠。收缩期肺静脉血流逆转能高精度地识别出三分之二的重度MR患者。在无血流逆转的患者中,多平面彩色多普勒TEE非常能够评估MR严重程度,但双平面和单平面TEE同样准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验