Somach S C, Taira J W, Pitha J V, Everett M A
Department of Dermatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA.
Arch Dermatol. 1996 Nov;132(11):1297-302.
A consecutive sample of 46 cases was collected for comparative histologic evaluation. Results of incisional biopsies of cutaneous pigmented lesions interpreted as lentigo maligna, melanoma in situ, or invasive melanoma, and those suggestive, but not diagnostic, of melanoma were collected. Those lesions that were on actinically damaged skin and in which biopsy was followed by complete excision within 6 months were included. Incisional biopsies that removed greater than 50% of the surface area of the lesion were excluded.
Of the excisional specimens, 40% demonstrated histopathologic features more pronounced than those in the biopsy specimens. Areas of invasive melanoma not detected in the biopsy specimens were observed in 20% of the excisional specimens. Accurate diagnosis based on small biopsy specimens was not always possible because of the absence of a classic lentigo maligna histologic pattern in many cases. The most frequent deviation from the pattern was the presence of lentiginous epidermal hyperplasia within these lesions.
These results suggest that limited sampling may be inadequate for an accurate diagnosis of pigmented melanocytic lesions on actinically damaged skin. Areas chosen for biopsy may not contain the most advanced areas histologically and may fail to detect foci of invasive melanoma elsewhere within the lesion.
收集了46例连续病例用于组织学对比评估。收集了皮肤色素性病变的切开活检结果,这些病变被诊断为恶性雀斑样痣、原位黑色素瘤或浸润性黑色素瘤,以及那些提示但不能确诊为黑色素瘤的病变。纳入那些位于光损伤皮肤且活检后6个月内进行完整切除的病变。排除切除病变表面积超过50%的切开活检。
在切除标本中,40%显示出比活检标本更明显的组织病理学特征。20%的切除标本中观察到活检标本未检测到的浸润性黑色素瘤区域。由于许多病例缺乏典型的恶性雀斑样痣组织学模式,基于小活检标本进行准确诊断并不总是可行的。这些病变中最常见的模式偏差是存在雀斑样表皮增生。
这些结果表明,有限的取材可能不足以准确诊断光损伤皮肤上的色素性黑素细胞病变。活检所取区域在组织学上可能不包含最进展的区域,并且可能无法检测到病变内其他部位的浸润性黑色素瘤灶。