Tausendpfund C, Petro W
Klinik Bad Reichenhall, Atmungsorgane und Allergien.
Pneumologie. 1996 Mar;50(3):260-7.
A great variety of application devices for long-term-oxygen-therapy are being used. In order to find out which products can be especially recommended we conducted an inquiry among German lung specialists asking which devices they were preferring and why. Additionally, in a clinical study the efficiency of basic types of products has been compared. Data about patients' acceptance of different devices have been collected by another inquiry. As it turned out the most efficient models (e.g. oxygen catheters) are only accepted by a very small number of patients. So they can not be recommended for long-term-oxygen-therapy. Patients' acceptance concentrates on nasal oxygen cannulae having two tubes that lead into the nostrils but no foam pad. The product PARI 96.2020 is expecially favoured as it combines "tight fit", "soft material" and "easy handling", criteria most important for the patients. Similar models (PARI 96.2021 and Airlife), although following on the next two places, are only favoured by half as much patients. As obviously quite simple, functional products are preferred to very sophisticated and expensive ones, future development should also follow the demands of patients, not only theoretical considerations.
目前正在使用各种各样的长期氧疗应用设备。为了找出哪些产品特别值得推荐，我们对德国肺部专家进行了一项调查，询问他们更喜欢哪些设备以及原因。此外，在一项临床研究中，对基本类型产品的效率进行了比较。通过另一项调查收集了关于患者对不同设备接受程度的数据。结果发现，最有效的型号（如氧气导管）只有极少数患者接受。因此，它们不适合长期氧疗推荐。患者的接受度集中在双管鼻氧管上，这种鼻氧管通向鼻孔但没有泡沫垫。产品PARI 96.2020特别受青睐，因为它结合了“贴合度高”、“材质柔软”和“操作简便”这些对患者来说最重要的标准。类似型号（PARI 96.2021和Airlife）虽然排在接下来的两位，但受到青睐的患者数量只有前者的一半。显然，相当简单、实用的产品比非常复杂和昂贵的产品更受青睐，未来的发展不仅应基于理论考虑，还应遵循患者的需求。
