Dutt M, Vollmar J, Assan R
Diabete Metab. 1977 Jun;3(2):113-6.
160 oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) were carried out, the glucose measurements being performed with the rapid dry-lab device Reflomat/Reflotest-Glucose and the GOD-Perid method. In 151 patients (94.4%) the two methods of measuring glucose led to the same diagnoses (i.e. "normal", "suspect" or "diabetic"). This high conformity in the results suggests the reliability of the rapid device in conducting OGTTs. Only in 9 subjects (5.6%) were the clinical conclusions different, Reflotest-Glucose giving predominantly "more pathological" results. It is, however, not possible to say which method showed "falsely positive" and which one "falsely negative" results.
共进行了160次口服葡萄糖耐量试验（OGTT），使用快速干式实验室设备Reflomat/Reflotest-Glucose和葡萄糖氧化酶-过氧化物酶法（GOD-Perid法）进行血糖测量。在151名患者（94.4%）中，两种血糖测量方法得出了相同的诊断结果（即“正常”、“疑似”或“糖尿病”）。结果的高度一致性表明该快速设备在进行OGTT时具有可靠性。只有9名受试者（5.6%）的临床结论不同，Reflotest-Glucose主要给出“更具病理性”的结果。然而，无法确定哪种方法显示出“假阳性”结果，哪种方法显示出“假阴性”结果。
