Hutcheson M S, Pedersen D, Anastas N D, Fitzgerald J, Silverman D
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Research and Standards, Boston 02108, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996 Aug;24(1 Pt 1):85-101. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0066.
The term "total petroleum hydrocarbons" (TPH) is a widely used, but loosely defined, parameter quantified by a number of different methodologies for expressing the aggregate amount of petroleum hydrocarbon compounds (PHCs) in a sample. Because of the shortcomings associated with comparing data from different methods, and the difficulty of assessing potential toxicities of complex mixtures of hydrocarbons, a new approach at more fully and explicitly defining the PHC composition of samples and predicting human noncancer health risks from those exposures has been developed. This new approach is the subject of this paper. This method can be used to perform site-specific risk assessments or to develop health-based cleanup standards for petroleum hydrocarbons. The technique divides the broad chemical classes of PHC (i.e., saturated versus unsaturated) into subgroups of compounds based on numbers of carbon atoms in the compounds within each subgroup. The mass of compounds in each subgroup is then translated into discrete estimates of health risk for specified exposure scenarios. The subgroups were identified from qualitative and quantitative changes in the nature of noncancer toxicities recorded in the literature. For saturated compounds, toxicity changes as carbon chain length increases (measured by numbers of carbon atoms). A "reference compound" was chosen for each range of compounds, usually because its toxicity was relatively well characterized. A published oral reference dose (RfD) was identified for these compounds, or in the absence of a published value, an oral dose-response value was developed from available toxicity information. For saturated PHCs (alkanes, cycloalkanes, and isoalkanes) the subgroups' reference compounds and assigned toxicity value used are C5 to C8 (n-hexane, 0.06 mg/kg/day); C9 to C18 (n-nonane, 0.6 mg/kg/day); and C19 to C32 (eicosane, 6.0 mg/kg/day). For unsaturated compounds (aromatics), one reference RfD was identified for all compounds: C9 through C32 (pyrene, 0.03 mg/kg/day). Dependent upon the analytical technique used for separation of compounds, the unsaturated alkenes may be grouped and subsequently quantified with either the saturate or unsaturate groups. The implications of possible association with either group and contributions to risk estimates are probably not significant. Alkenes make up a small fraction of most fuel products, and they bear structural similarity to the alkanes and are not particularly toxicologically active. If grouped analytically with the aromatics the alkene contribution to toxicity estimates would likely be minor and not be an underestimate of its true toxicity. The mass of PHC in each segment of a chromatogram is quantified and converted to a medium-specific concentration which is then entered into standard medium intake equations to arrive at a daily dose of PHC. This dose is then used with the toxicity value identified for the particular segment of the chromatogram to derive a hazard quotient. The quotients can then be summed across fractions to yield a total hazard index. The noncancer health risks from the aromatics benzene, toluene, and xylenes are evaluated separately using standard risk assessment techniques.
“总石油烃”(TPH)是一个广泛使用但定义松散的参数,通过多种不同方法进行量化,以表示样品中石油烃化合物(PHC)的总量。由于不同方法的数据比较存在缺陷,且评估碳氢化合物复杂混合物的潜在毒性存在困难,因此已开发出一种新方法,可更全面、明确地定义样品的PHC组成,并预测这些暴露对人类非致癌健康风险。本文将探讨这种新方法。该方法可用于进行特定场地的风险评估,或制定基于健康的石油烃清理标准。该技术根据每个亚组内化合物的碳原子数,将PHC的宽泛化学类别(即饱和与不饱和)划分为化合物亚组。然后,将每个亚组中化合物的质量转化为特定暴露场景下健康风险的离散估计值。这些亚组是根据文献中记录的非致癌毒性性质的定性和定量变化确定的。对于饱和化合物,毒性随碳链长度增加而变化(以碳原子数衡量)。针对每个化合物范围选择一种“参考化合物”,通常是因为其毒性特征相对明确。已确定这些化合物的已公布口服参考剂量(RfD),或者在没有公布值的情况下,根据可用的毒性信息制定口服剂量-反应值。对于饱和PHC(烷烃、环烷烃和异烷烃),亚组的参考化合物及指定的毒性值分别为:C5至C8(正己烷,0.06毫克/千克/天);C9至C18(正壬烷,0.6毫克/千克/天);C19至C32(二十烷,6.0毫克/千克/天)。对于不饱和化合物(芳烃),为所有化合物确定了一个参考RfD:C9至C32(芘,0.03毫克/千克/天)。根据用于分离化合物的分析技术,不饱和烯烃可能会被分组,并随后与饱和或不饱和组一起进行量化。与任何一组关联的可能性及其对风险估计的贡献可能并不显著。烯烃在大多数燃料产品中占比很小,它们与烷烃结构相似,且在毒理学上并非特别活跃。如果在分析上与芳烃归为一组,烯烃对毒性估计的贡献可能很小,且不会低估其真实毒性。色谱图各部分中PHC的质量被量化并转换为特定介质浓度,然后将其代入标准介质摄入量方程,以得出PHC的每日剂量。然后,将该剂量与为色谱图特定部分确定的毒性值一起用于得出危害商数。然后可以将这些商数在各部分求和,得出总危害指数。芳烃苯、甲苯和二甲苯的非致癌健康风险使用标准风险评估技术单独评估。