Vogt A M, Htun P, Arras M, Podzuweit T, Schaper W
Max-Planck-Institut für Physiological and Clinical Research, Bad Nauheim, FRG.
Basic Res Cardiol. 1996 Sep-Oct;91(5):389-400. doi: 10.1007/BF00788719.
Many of the new tool drugs useful for the study of molecular mechanisms of ischemic preconditioning (IP) are very valuable in in vitro systems but produce undesired side-effects after systemic injection in intact animals that limit their applicability. Our aim was to develop an experimental in vivo model that allows the use of said drugs in sufficiently high local concentrations, but avoiding at the same time the systemic side-effects. Several techniques were combined to study regional damage or protection as a result of local drug infusion such as nuclear staining, NADH fluorescence, fluorescent microspheres and tetrazolium salts. In open-chest pigs, the intramyocardial infusion (20 microliters/min) of the adenosine A1-receptor agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (0.3 mmol) for 10 min prior to a 60-min LAD-occlusion and 120-min reperfusion mimicked IP by exerting a local protection (n = 9, p < 0.001). Krebs-Henseleit buffer (negative control) was without protective effect. IP's cardioprotection was locally prevented by the intramyocardial application of the adenosine A1-receptor antagonist cyclopentyltheophylline (1 mmol, infused during IP; n = 6, p < 0.001) but not by KHB. The protein kinase C (PKC)-inhibitors staurosporine (100 nmol, n = 6) or bisindolylmaleimide (BIS, 25 mumol, n = 9) did not prevent IP locally. The PKC activator phorbol myristate acetate (PMA, 1 mumol, n = 6) was ineffective in preventing ischemic injury and increased the amount of necrosis in IP, whereas BIS exerted a local myocardial protection (n = 9, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the new model of intramyocardial infusion appears to be useful for the investigation of IP's signal transduction. Our data support the role of the adenosine A1-receptor in IP, but suggest that inhibition instead of activation of PKC may protect ischemic myocardium from infarction.
许多对研究缺血预处理(IP)分子机制有用的新型工具药物在体外系统中非常有价值,但在完整动物全身注射后会产生不良副作用,限制了它们的适用性。我们的目标是开发一种实验性体内模型,该模型允许以足够高的局部浓度使用上述药物,同时避免全身副作用。结合了几种技术来研究局部药物输注导致的局部损伤或保护,如核染色、NADH荧光、荧光微球和四氮唑盐。在开胸猪中,在左前降支闭塞60分钟和再灌注120分钟之前,心肌内输注(20微升/分钟)腺苷A1受体激动剂N6-环己基腺苷(0.3毫摩尔)10分钟,通过发挥局部保护作用模拟了IP(n = 9,p < 0.001)。 Krebs-Henseleit缓冲液(阴性对照)没有保护作用。IP的心脏保护作用在心肌内应用腺苷A1受体拮抗剂环戊基茶碱(1毫摩尔,在IP期间输注;n = 6,p < 0.001)后被局部阻断,但KHB没有此作用。蛋白激酶C(PKC)抑制剂星形孢菌素(100纳摩尔,n = 6)或双吲哚马来酰胺(BIS,25微摩尔,n = 9)没有局部阻断IP。PKC激活剂佛波酯(PMA,1微摩尔,n = 6)在预防缺血性损伤方面无效,并且增加了IP中的坏死量,而BIS发挥了局部心肌保护作用(n = 9,p < 0.001)。总之,新的心肌内输注模型似乎对研究IP的信号转导有用。我们的数据支持腺苷A1受体在IP中的作用,但表明抑制而非激活PKC可能保护缺血心肌免于梗死。