Pasterkamp G, Spijkerboer A M, Mali W P, Borst C
Heart Lung Institute, Utrecht University Hospital, The Netherlands.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22(7):801-6. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(96)00081-6.
Exact determination of the percentage luminal stenosis after balloon angioplasty is essential when deciding to redilate or not, especially since the percentage luminal stenosis may be a predictor for long-term outcome. Conflicting percentage residual stenosis is frequently observed when angiography is compared with duplex or intravascular ultrasound measurements. The aim of the present study was to compare the percentage luminal stenosis after balloon angioplasty determined by duplex and intravascular ultrasound. In 22 patients, balloon angioplasty was performed in the superficial femoral artery to treat disabling claudication. Intravascular ultrasound studies were performed immediately after balloon angioplasty; duplex studies were performed 24-36 h after intervention. Intravascular ultrasound percentage luminal stenosis was calculated with respect to a proximal reference lumen. Duplex percentage luminal stenosis was determined by two methods: first, by assuming that the increase in peak flow velocity is directly related to lumen area; and second, by considering a peak flow velocity ratio of 1.6 and 2.4 is representative for > 30% and > 50% diameter stenosis, respectively. The percentage luminal stenosis calculated from duplex measurements was higher compared with intravascular ultrasound measurements (y = 0.38x + 20.1, r = 0.57). Excluding cross-sections with vascular wall damage (dissection or plaque fracture) over more than 60 degrees of the circumference improved the slope and correlation coefficient of intravascular ultrasound measurements versus duplex measurements (y = 0.88x + 7.8, r = 0.70). Thus, after balloon angioplasty, conflicting percentage luminal stenosis is frequently observed using intravascular ultrasound and duplex measurements. These differences in percentage luminal stenosis may partly be explained by the extent of vascular wall damage visualized on the intravascular ultrasound image.
在决定是否再次扩张时,准确测定球囊血管成形术后管腔狭窄百分比至关重要,特别是因为管腔狭窄百分比可能是长期预后的预测指标。当将血管造影与双功超声或血管内超声测量结果进行比较时,经常会观察到残余狭窄百分比相互矛盾的情况。本研究的目的是比较双功超声和血管内超声测定的球囊血管成形术后管腔狭窄百分比。22例患者在股浅动脉进行球囊血管成形术以治疗致残性跛行。球囊血管成形术后立即进行血管内超声检查;干预后24 - 36小时进行双功超声检查。血管内超声管腔狭窄百分比是相对于近端参考管腔计算得出的。双功超声管腔狭窄百分比通过两种方法确定:第一,假设峰值流速的增加与管腔面积直接相关;第二,认为峰值流速比为1.6和2.4分别代表直径狭窄> 30%和> 50%。与血管内超声测量结果相比,双功超声测量计算出的管腔狭窄百分比更高(y = 0.38x + 20.1,r = 0.57)。排除圆周超过60度存在血管壁损伤(夹层或斑块破裂)的横截面,可改善血管内超声测量与双功超声测量之间的斜率和相关系数(y = 0.88x + 7.8,r = 0.70)。因此,球囊血管成形术后,使用血管内超声和双功超声测量时经常会观察到管腔狭窄百分比相互矛盾的情况。这些管腔狭窄百分比的差异可能部分由血管内超声图像上可见的血管壁损伤程度来解释。