Higashida Y, Baba Y, Hatemura M, Yoshida A, Takada T, Takahashi M
Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University College of Medical Science, Japan.
Acad Radiol. 1996 Oct;3(10):842-8. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(96)80274-1.
To evaluate the potential utility of a 2,048 x 2,048-matrix image intensifier television digital radiography (DR) system versus a conventional screen-film (S-F) system for bone radiography.
Basic imaging properties were evaluated including resolution properties, Wiener spectra, and detectabilities of low-contrast signals. DR images were obtained with the same exposure (iso-dose) or one-third the exposure (low-dose) used with the S-F system. The visibility of pathologic details of metastatic disease on bone radiographs of 27 patients was evaluated subjectively by six radiologists.
Resolution properties of the DR system were slightly superior to those of the S-F system at low-frequency range, but the S-F system showed considerably higher resolution properties at the high-frequency range. The noise levels for iso-dose DR were slightly greater than those for S-F imaging at low spatial frequency; however, low-dose digital radiographs showed higher noise levels. Visibility of details of diagnostic features on bone radiographs was similar with both systems, but the low-dose digital radiographs were slightly inferior.
High-resolution image intensifier television DR systems may be clinically useful for bone radiography.
