• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[拟交感神经药与茶碱:联合使用?]

[Sympathomimetics and theophylline: combined use?].

作者信息

Alvarez Sintes R, Alvarez Sintes R, Alvarez Castro M R

机构信息

Medicina Interna y Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Clínico-Quirúrgico Docente, Calixto García, La Habana, Cuba.

出版信息

An Med Interna. 1995 Sep;12(9):438-41.

PMID:8924548
Abstract

Bronchodilator effect and toxicity of theophylline 300 mg twice a day (E1), Salbutamol 4 mg tid (E2), their combination in higher (200/4 mg, E3), and lower doses (100/2 mg E4), and placebo calcium lactate (300 mg) tid (E5) were compared in 30 patients with bronchial asthma in a randomized cross over trial. Statistically significant second (FEV1) was observed in all the active treatment groups (E1, to E4) compared with placebo (E5). Almost all the regimens were tolerated well and no patient showed major adverse reaction or cardiotoxicity necessitating withdrawal of the drug. On the other hand, minor adverse reactions were common and the high dose combination (E3) was found to have more adverse reactions than the low dose combination and either drug used alone.

摘要

在一项随机交叉试验中,对30例支气管哮喘患者比较了每日两次300毫克茶碱(E1)、每日三次4毫克沙丁胺醇(E2)、高剂量组合(200/4毫克,E3)和低剂量组合(100/2毫克,E4)以及安慰剂乳酸钙(300毫克)每日三次(E5)的支气管扩张作用和毒性。与安慰剂组(E5)相比,在所有活性治疗组(E1至E4)中观察到第二秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)有统计学意义的改善。几乎所有治疗方案耐受性良好,没有患者出现需要停药的严重不良反应或心脏毒性。另一方面,轻微不良反应很常见,发现高剂量组合(E3)比低剂量组合以及单独使用任何一种药物有更多的不良反应。

相似文献

1
[Sympathomimetics and theophylline: combined use?].[拟交感神经药与茶碱:联合使用?]
An Med Interna. 1995 Sep;12(9):438-41.
2
Is combined therapy of sympathomimetics and theophylline indicated?拟交感神经药与茶碱的联合治疗是否适用?
J Asthma. 1993;30(1):29-35. doi: 10.3109/02770909309066377.
3
Efficacy and safety of doxofylline compared to theophylline in chronic reversible asthma -- a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled multicentre clinical trial.多索茶碱与氨茶碱治疗慢性可逆性哮喘的疗效及安全性比较——一项双盲随机安慰剂对照多中心临床试验
Med Sci Monit. 2002 Apr;8(4):CR297-304.
4
Comparison of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (FP) combination with FP+sustained release theophylline in moderate asthma patients.沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松(FP)联合用药与FP+缓释茶碱治疗中度哮喘患者的比较。
Respir Med. 2008 Jul;102(7):1055-64. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.01.021. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
5
Comparative efficacy of oral sustained released bronchodilator in stable asthmatics.口服缓释支气管扩张剂对稳定期哮喘患者的疗效比较
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1993 Apr-Jun;35(2):51-7.
6
Effects of salmeterol in patients with persistent asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroid plus theophylline.沙美特罗对接受吸入性糖皮质激素加茶碱治疗的持续性哮喘患者的影响。
Respiration. 2007;74(6):611-6. doi: 10.1159/000095678. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
7
Theophylline versus terbutaline in treating critically ill children with status asthmaticus: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.氨茶碱与特布他林治疗重症哮喘儿童的疗效比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Mar;6(2):142-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000154943.24151.58.
8
Plant-based formulation for bronchial asthma: a controlled clinical trial to compare its efficacy with oral salbutamol and theophylline.用于支气管哮喘的植物性制剂:一项将其疗效与口服沙丁胺醇和茶碱相比较的对照临床试验。
Respiration. 2006;73(4):457-63. doi: 10.1159/000089922. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
9
Combination therapy with the single inhaler salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus increased doses of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma.哮喘患者使用沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松单吸入器联合治疗与增加吸入性糖皮质激素剂量的比较。
Respiration. 2007;74(1):33-43. doi: 10.1159/000096023. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
10
[Therapy of nocturnal asthma: salmeterol versus nocturnal administration of retard theophylline--comparison of effectiveness and tolerance].
Pneumologie. 1997 Mar;51(3):317-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral xanthines as maintenance treatment for asthma in children.口服黄嘌呤类药物作为儿童哮喘的维持治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD002885. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002885.pub2.