• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[前列腺癌的术前T分期:直肠内磁共振断层扫描与其他影像学及临床方法的比较]

[Preoperative T-staging of prostatic carcinoma: endorectal magnetic resonance tomography compared with other imaging and clinical methods].

作者信息

Böni R A, Hutter B E, Trinkler F, Jochum W, Pestalozzi D, Krestin G P

机构信息

Departement für Medizinische Radiologie, Universitätsspital Zürich.

出版信息

Rofo. 1996 Aug;165(2):152-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015731.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1015731
PMID:8924668
Abstract

PURPOSE

The diagnostic value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in comparison to clinical information and other imaging modalities was analysed in order to define the most accurate preoperative staging method.

METHODS

54 patients with biopsy proven prostate carcinoma, who underwent subsequent prostatectomy, were examined with an endorectal surface coil. The results were compared to body coil MRI, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen levels. In 37 patients, results of endorectal ultrasound were available.

RESULTS

Staging accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of endorectal coil MRI were 83.3%. For body coil MRI, staging accuracy was 59.2%, sensitivity 43.3% and specificity 82.6%, for transrectal ultrasound 59.5%, 36.4% and 91.7% and for the digital rectal examination 55.6%, 26.7% and 91.7%, respectively. Staging accuracy of endorectal MRI was significantly (p < 0.05) superior to that of the other imaging modalities.

CONCLUSION

Endorectal coil MRI allows reliable distinction between localised and advanced tumour stages and is superior to other imaging techniques in this regard. It can thus be recommended for staging in patients with prostate carcinoma.

摘要

目的

分析直肠内磁共振成像(MRI)相较于临床信息及其他成像方式的诊断价值,以确定最准确的术前分期方法。

方法

对54例经活检证实为前列腺癌且随后接受前列腺切除术的患者,使用直肠内表面线圈进行检查。将结果与体线圈MRI、直肠指检及前列腺特异性抗原水平进行比较。37例患者可获得直肠内超声检查结果。

结果

直肠内线圈MRI的分期准确率、敏感性和特异性分别为83.3%。体线圈MRI的分期准确率为59.2%,敏感性为43.3%,特异性为82.6%;经直肠超声的分期准确率为59.5%,敏感性为36.4%,特异性为91.7%;直肠指检的分期准确率为55.6%,敏感性为26.7%,特异性为91.7%。直肠内MRI的分期准确率显著高于其他成像方式(p < 0.05)。

结论

直肠内线圈MRI能够可靠地区分局限性和进展期肿瘤阶段,在这方面优于其他成像技术。因此,推荐其用于前列腺癌患者的分期。

相似文献

1
[Preoperative T-staging of prostatic carcinoma: endorectal magnetic resonance tomography compared with other imaging and clinical methods].[前列腺癌的术前T分期:直肠内磁共振断层扫描与其他影像学及临床方法的比较]
Rofo. 1996 Aug;165(2):152-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015731.
2
[MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].[使用三种不同线圈系统的前列腺癌磁共振成像:图像质量、肿瘤检测及分期]
Rofo. 2003 Jun;175(6):799-805. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39929.
3
Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve?经验可提高前列腺癌直肠内磁共振成像的分期准确性:学习曲线是怎样的?
Can J Urol. 2007 Feb;14(1):3429-34.
4
[Magnetic resonance with an endorectal coil and a fast spin echo sequence in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. The correlation with histopathological data].[直肠内线圈磁共振成像及快速自旋回波序列在前列腺癌分期中的应用。与组织病理学数据的相关性]
Radiol Med. 1997 Nov;94(5):496-502.
5
Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.直肠内线圈磁共振成像在直肠癌局部分期中的应用
Radiol Med. 2002 Jan-Feb;103(1-2):74-83.
6
[Locoregional staging of prostatic carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in 75 patients treated with radical prostatectomy].[前列腺癌的局部区域分期:75例行根治性前列腺切除术患者经直肠线圈磁共振成像的准确性]
Radiol Med. 1998 May;95(5):498-505.
7
[Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level].[前列腺癌分期:直肠内磁共振成像、活检 Gleason 评分及术前前列腺特异性抗原水平联合信息的价值]
Rofo. 2006 Apr;178(4):385-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-926475.
8
Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.前列腺癌的定位:直肠内磁共振成像和三维磁共振波谱成像与经直肠超声引导活检的比较
Urol Int. 2012;88(1):12-7. doi: 10.1159/000331909. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
9
[Magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma. Comparison with histologic macrosections in 40 cases].[直肠内线圈磁共振成像在前列腺癌局部分期中的应用。40例病例与组织学大体切片的比较]
Radiol Med. 1999 Jun;97(6):491-8.
10
Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.相控阵3.0-T磁共振成像与直肠内1.5-T磁共振成像在评估前列腺癌局部分期准确性方面的比较。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):534-8. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000250108.85799.e1.

引用本文的文献

1
MR Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Diffusion Weighted Imaging and (3D) Hydrogen 1 (H) MR Spectroscopy in Comparison with Histology.前列腺癌的磁共振成像:扩散加权成像和(三维)氢质子磁共振波谱与组织学的比较
Radiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:616852. doi: 10.1155/2011/616852. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
2
[Imaging modalities for primary diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer].[前列腺癌初步诊断与分期的影像学检查方法]
Urologe A. 2010 Feb;49(2):190-8. doi: 10.1007/s00120-010-2235-6.
3
Three-dimensional 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate in clinical practice: technique and results in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen and negative or no previous prostate biopsies.
临床实践中前列腺的三维氢磁共振波谱分析:前列腺特异性抗原升高且既往前列腺活检阴性或未进行过活检患者的技术与结果
Eur Radiol. 2005 Apr;15(4):645-52. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2562-3. Epub 2004 Dec 31.