Gardner I A, Hietala S, Boyce W M
Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, 95616, USA.
Rev Sci Tech. 1996 Mar;15(1):323-35. doi: 10.20506/rst.15.1.926.
Transposition of diagnostic tests used in domestic livestock species to free-ranging and captive wildlife species has two problems. First, most existing tests have not been adequately validated in domestic livestock. Second, assumptions that a serological test will perform identically in wildlife and livestock species may not be correct, due to differences in pathogenic strains and serovars, host serological responses, and exposure to organisms of similar antigenic structure which produce cross-reacting antibodies. Some assays require species-specific reagents/test components which might not be commercially available, and most assays have not been standardized. The authors outline the principles involved in the evaluation of a serological diagnostic test, and provide examples of how knowledge of test sensitivity and specificity can be used to estimate true prevalence, to determine whether a population is infected, and to facilitate management decisions with regard to animal translocations.
将用于家畜物种的诊断测试应用于自由放养和圈养的野生动物物种存在两个问题。首先,大多数现有测试在家畜中尚未得到充分验证。其次,由于致病菌株和血清型、宿主血清反应以及接触产生交叉反应抗体的具有相似抗原结构的生物体存在差异,血清学测试在野生动物和家畜物种中表现相同的假设可能并不正确。一些检测需要物种特异性试剂/测试组件,而这些可能无法从商业渠道获得,并且大多数检测尚未标准化。作者概述了血清学诊断测试评估中涉及的原则,并举例说明了如何利用测试敏感性和特异性的知识来估计真实患病率、确定种群是否感染以及促进有关动物转移的管理决策。