Leblanc B, Paquin J M, Valiquette L, Perreault J P, Faucher R, Mauffette F, Benard F
Départment de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Prog Urol. 1996 Aug-Sep;6(4):535-8.
In a retrospective study from a unique center (St. Luc Hospital, Montreal) stone clearance of 88 consecutive distal ureteral calculi (below pelvic brim) treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in situ were compared to a group of 94 distal ureteral calculi treated by ureteroscopy during the same period. Our results show 84% success rate for ureteroscopy which is clearly superior than 58% stone clearance rate at 3 month follow-up for ESWL Success rate was influenced by stone size in the ESWL group but not in the ureteroscopy group. This study reveals similar success rate for calculi smaller than 6 mm but for larger calculi, success rate of ureteroscopy is significantly superior.
在一项来自一个独特中心（蒙特利尔圣卢克医院）的回顾性研究中，将连续88例通过原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗的远端输尿管结石（骨盆边缘以下）的结石清除情况，与同期94例通过输尿管镜检查治疗的远端输尿管结石组进行了比较。我们的结果显示，输尿管镜检查的成功率为84%，这明显高于体外冲击波碎石术在3个月随访时58%的结石清除率。体外冲击波碎石术组的成功率受结石大小影响，而输尿管镜检查组则不受影响。这项研究表明，对于小于6毫米的结石，成功率相似，但对于较大的结石，输尿管镜检查的成功率明显更高。
