• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[福利国家的守护者?]

[Guardians of the welfare state?].

作者信息

Nessa J

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Aug 30;116(20):2452-4.

PMID:8928107
Abstract

The welfare state in post-war Norwegian society is a result of the dominating social democratic ideology now adapted to far-reaching technological development. Increased spending on health has provoked the question of whether doctors should be the guardians of the welfare state against inappropriate demands from patients. This paper argues against this view. What is really a problem for the whole society cannot be solved on the individual level. In many ways, to be sick is to fall outside the community, with a real risk of loosing rights and duties essential to all of us. The doctor has to find-and redefine-his ancient role of spokesman and champion, and of serving as a friendly and emphatic corrective to the individual patient. This is particularly important in modern health services where having to face interpersonal problems is a key element of everyday practice.

摘要

战后挪威社会的福利国家是占主导地位的社会民主意识形态适应深远技术发展的结果。医疗支出的增加引发了一个问题,即医生是否应该成为福利国家抵御患者不当要求的守护者。本文反对这种观点。整个社会真正的问题无法在个人层面得到解决。在很多方面,生病意味着脱离社会,存在失去对我们所有人都至关重要的权利和义务的切实风险。医生必须找到并重新定义其古老的角色,即发言人、捍卫者,以及对个体患者起到友好且有说服力的纠正作用。这在现代医疗服务中尤为重要,因为在日常实践中,面对人际问题是一个关键要素。

相似文献

1
[Guardians of the welfare state?].[福利国家的守护者?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Aug 30;116(20):2452-4.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[Patients' advocate or defender of the welfare state?].[患者权益倡导者还是福利国家捍卫者?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Aug 30;116(20):2455-7.
4
[Moral principles of health justice].
Medicina (B Aires). 1992;52(3):265-8.
5
[Equality and brotherhood--values worth preserving in the health services].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 Apr 20;119(10):1474-9.
6
Shrinking social space in the doctor-modern patient relationship: a review of forces for, and implications of, homologisation.医患现代关系中社会空间的收缩:同质化的驱动因素及其影响综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jan;74(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.053. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
7
[Medical justice as a priority for Latin America].[医疗正义作为拉丁美洲的优先事项]
P R Health Sci J. 1997 Dec;16(4):429-36.
8
The scope and limits of equality as a normative guide to federal health care policy.平等作为联邦医疗保健政策规范性指南的范围与局限。
Public Policy. 1978 Fall;26(4):481-532.
9
The Norwegian welfare state on the threshold of a new century.新世纪门槛上的挪威福利国家。
Scand J Public Health. 2003;31(2):81-4. doi: 10.1080/14034940210165172.
10
[Justice--the most demanding of virtues].[正义——最为严苛的美德]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 Mar 20;119(8):1149-53.