Suppr超能文献

不列颠群岛内17个实验室对六种商用脂蛋白(a)检测方法的比较研究。

A comparative study of six commercial lipoprotein(a) assays in seventeen laboratories within the British Isles.

作者信息

Mackness M I, Bhatnagar D, Weiringa G, MBewu A, Haynes B, Durrington P N

机构信息

University Department of Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, UK.

出版信息

Ann Clin Biochem. 1996 Jan;33 ( Pt 1):63-70. doi: 10.1177/000456329603300110.

Abstract

Seventeen laboratories in the British Isles participated in a study to compare six different commercially available immunoassays for serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and to establish reasons for the variations in the measurement of serum Lp(a) concentrations. Pooled serum was distributed neat and after dilution at a central laboratory. In addition, the central laboratory sent unpooled serum sampled monthly from six healthy volunteers to each of the participating laboratories for 12 months. The assays all gave linear dilution curves which were parallel, although the reported values varied twofold. There were major differences in the values assigned to different manufacturers' calibrants which was not explained by whether the units employed were whole Lp(a), the protein moiety of Lp(a) or simply apolipoprotein(a). The coefficient of variation for the reported value of Lp(a) over 12 months was 33%. The component variation was 10% after adjustment for inter-laboratory and intra-laboratory variation. Some individuals clearly had a greater tendency to variable serum Lp(a) concentrations than others, but all the assays responded to this in the same way. Thus, the assays tested probably measured the same analyte. The problem of calibration could largely be addressed if agreement were reached by the manufacturers. Even with improvements in analytical precision it should be realized that multiple measurements of serum Lp(a) levels are necessary if the true mean value is to be appreciated. Individuals showing wide variation in serum Lp(a) may reward further study if its role is to be established.

摘要

不列颠群岛的17家实验室参与了一项研究,以比较六种不同的市售血清脂蛋白(a)(Lp(a))免疫测定方法,并确定血清Lp(a)浓度测量值存在差异的原因。混合血清在中心实验室直接分发并进行稀释后分发。此外,中心实验室在12个月内每月从六名健康志愿者身上采集未混合的血清,并将其发送给每个参与实验室。尽管报告的值相差两倍,但所有测定均给出了平行的线性稀释曲线。不同制造商校准物的赋值存在重大差异,这无法通过所采用的单位是完整的Lp(a)、Lp(a)的蛋白质部分还是仅仅是载脂蛋白(a)来解释。12个月内Lp(a)报告值的变异系数为33%。在校正实验室间和实验室内变异后,组分变异为10%。一些个体的血清Lp(a)浓度变化趋势明显比其他个体更大,但所有测定对此的反应方式相同。因此,所测试的测定方法可能测量的是同一种分析物。如果制造商达成一致,校准问题在很大程度上可以得到解决。即使分析精度有所提高,也应该认识到,如果要了解真实的平均值,对血清Lp(a)水平进行多次测量是必要的。如果要确定血清Lp(a)变化较大的个体的作用,可能值得进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验