Kenney W L, Armstrong C G
Noll Physiological Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802-6900,
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Feb;80(2):512-5. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.2.512.
The purpose of this study was to compare reflex control of limb blood flow in healthy young (Y; 26 +/- 2 yr) and older (O;61 +/- 2 yr) men during whole body cooling under resting conditions. To better isolate the effect of chronological age, the two age groups (n = 6 per group) were closely matched for maximal oxygen uptake, body surface area, skinfold thickness, and fat-free weight. Subjects sat in an environmentally controlled chamber clad in standardized (0.6-clo) light cotton clothing at a dry-bulb temperature (Tdb) of 28 degrees C. After 30 min, Tdb was decreased by 2 degrees C every 5 min until Tdb = 10 degrees C, where it was held constant for the remainder of the 120-min session. Esophageal and mean skin temperatures were monitored continuously. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured every 5 min by venous occlusion plethysmography by using a mercury-in-Silastic strain gauge while arm temperature between the wrist and elbow was clamped at 37.2 +/- 0.1 degrees C by localized warm air heating. In this way, limb vasoconstriction was driven solely by thermoregulatory reflexes and not by direct effects of localized cooling. Mean skin temperature decreased at a similar rate and to a similar extent (by approximately 6 degrees C over a 2-h period) in both age groups, whereas esophageal temperature was relatively unaffected. In response to the local heating, the Y group maintained a significantly higher FBF than did the O group during the initial 30 min but decreased FBF during the cooling phase at a greater rate and to a greater extent than did the O group, leading to a significantly lower FBF during the final 30 min (at Tdb = 10 degrees C). Because there was no age difference in the mean arterial pressure response, similar effects of age were seen on forearm vascular conductance (FBF/mean arterial pressure). It was concluded that older men have a diminished reflex limb vasoconstrictor response to skin cooling. Furthermore, this difference in control of peripheral blood flow appears to be related to age per se; i.e., it is not a reflection of age-related differences in maximal oxygen uptake or body composition.
本研究的目的是比较健康年轻男性(Y组;26±2岁)和老年男性(O组;61±2岁)在静息状态下全身冷却过程中肢体血流的反射控制。为了更好地分离年龄的影响,两个年龄组(每组n = 6)在最大摄氧量、体表面积、皮褶厚度和去脂体重方面进行了密切匹配。受试者坐在环境可控的舱室内,穿着标准化(0.6克罗)的轻质棉质衣物,干球温度(Tdb)为28℃。30分钟后,Tdb每5分钟降低2℃,直至Tdb = 10℃,并在120分钟的实验剩余时间内保持恒定。持续监测食管温度和平均皮肤温度。每隔5分钟通过静脉阻断体积描记法,使用硅橡胶汞应变计测量前臂血流量(FBF),同时通过局部暖空气加热将手腕和肘部之间的手臂温度夹在37.2±0.1℃。通过这种方式,肢体血管收缩仅由体温调节反射驱动,而不是由局部冷却的直接影响驱动。两个年龄组的平均皮肤温度以相似的速率和相似的程度下降(在2小时内下降约6℃),而食管温度相对未受影响。在局部加热的反应中,Y组在最初30分钟内维持的FBF显著高于O组,但在冷却阶段FBF下降的速率和幅度均大于O组,导致在最后30分钟(Tdb = 10℃时)FBF显著更低。由于平均动脉压反应没有年龄差异,年龄对前臂血管传导性(FBF/平均动脉压)有类似影响。研究得出结论,老年男性对皮肤冷却的反射性肢体血管收缩反应减弱。此外,外周血流控制的这种差异似乎与年龄本身有关;即,它不是最大摄氧量或身体成分中与年龄相关差异的反映。