Zsigmond E K, Kovacs V, Fekete G
Anesthesia Department, University of Illinois Medical School, Chicago, USA.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Feb;34(2):84-8.
Ketamine (K) i.m. has been widely used for anesthetic induction in small children in the last decades, if mask induction has failed. In many instances, however, physical restraint was required. In order to eliminate the pain of i.m. injection and to prevent the psychological and physical trauma associated with restraint, we evaluated the utility of jet-injection (j.i.) of K for anesthetic induction in a dose-range finding study. Thirty children (age 1-6 years), whose parents gave a valid consent approved by the IRB and were scheduled for minor surgeries, were randomized into 3 equal groups: A/ketamine 6.0 mg/kg j.i., B/ketamine 3.5 mg/kg j.i., C/ketamine 2.5 mg/kg j.i. As a drying agent atropine 20 microg/kg was also given i.v. The onset of full amnesic/sedative effect of K, the scoring of sedation and emotional state, the ease of placement of the i.v. catheter, the speed of recovery by Aldrete scores, and the time for safe discharge were evaluated. Although no demographic differences were observed among the groups the duration of surgery and anesthesia were longer in the B group (41 and 49 min) than in the A or C groups. The onset of sedation was significantly (p < 0.05) faster in group A (174 sec) than in group B (312 sec) or C (303 sec). However, no significant difference was observed in the onset of complete sedation among the groups. The sedation index was the lowest representing the best sedation in group A (4.2) while in group B and C were somewhat higher (4.6 and 4.4). There were no differences in the ease of i.v. cannulation among the groups. Recovery from anesthesia was the slowest in group A, although the differences among the 3 groups did not reach statistical significance. The mean discharge times ranged from 10-13 min with no differences among the groups. Laryngospasm occurred in 4:10 in group A and 1:10 in groups B and C. Evidently the high dose of K, 6.0 mg/kg caused a proneness to laryngospasm. Since no additional benefit was derived from this high dose, the lower doses (3.0 mg/kg) of K may be sufficient for routine use. None of the children experienced unpleasant recall or pain for the injection or the whole procedure. This new route of anesthetic induction with the jet-injector utilizing K may provide pain-free and stress-free induction as compared to its i.m. injection. This technique also prevents transmission of infection and is [correction of and cost] cost effective since simultaneous and/or sequential injection can be given from a single vial of K.
在过去几十年中,如果面罩诱导失败,氯胺酮(K)肌肉注射已被广泛用于小儿麻醉诱导。然而,在许多情况下,需要身体约束。为了消除肌肉注射的疼痛并防止与约束相关的心理和身体创伤,我们在一项剂量范围研究中评估了氯胺酮喷射注射(j.i.)用于麻醉诱导的效用。30名儿童(1 - 6岁),其父母给予经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的有效同意书且计划进行小手术,被随机分为3个相等的组:A组/氯胺酮6.0 mg/kg喷射注射,B组/氯胺酮3.5 mg/kg喷射注射,C组/氯胺酮2.5 mg/kg喷射注射。还静脉注射了20微克/千克的阿托品作为干燥剂。评估了氯胺酮完全失忆/镇静作用的起效时间、镇静和情绪状态评分、静脉导管放置的难易程度、用Aldrete评分评估的恢复速度以及安全出院时间。尽管各组之间未观察到人口统计学差异,但B组的手术和麻醉持续时间(41分钟和49分钟)比A组或C组更长。A组的镇静起效时间(174秒)明显比B组(312秒)或C组(303秒)更快(p < 0.05)。然而,各组之间在完全镇静的起效方面未观察到显著差异。镇静指数在A组最低(4.2),代表最佳镇静效果,而B组和C组稍高(4.6和4.4)。各组在静脉插管的难易程度上没有差异。A组的麻醉恢复最慢,尽管3组之间的差异未达到统计学意义。平均出院时间为10 - 13分钟,各组之间无差异。喉痉挛在A组中发生率为4/10,在B组和C组中为1/10。显然,6.0 mg/kg的高剂量氯胺酮导致易发生喉痉挛。由于该高剂量未带来额外益处,较低剂量(3.0 mg/kg)的氯胺酮可能足以用于常规使用。没有儿童经历不愉快的回忆或注射及整个过程的疼痛。与肌肉注射相比,这种利用氯胺酮的喷射注射器进行麻醉诱导的新途径可能提供无痛且无压力的诱导。该技术还可防止感染传播,并且具有成本效益,因为可以从单瓶氯胺酮中同时和/或顺序注射。