• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily ceftibuten and twice-daily cefprozil in the treatment of children with acute otitis media.

作者信息

Blumer J L, Forti W P, Summerhouse T L

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1996 Sep-Oct;18(5):811-20. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80041-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80041-5
PMID:8930425
Abstract

In this multicenter, randomized, single (investigator)-masked study, the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily ceftibuten and twice-daily cefprozil were compared in the treatment of acute otitis media in patients 6 months to 10 years of age. Ceftibuten oral suspension 9 mg/kg once daily (maximum dose, 400 mg/d) and cefprozil oral suspension 15 mg/kg twice daily (maximum dose, 1000 mg/d) were given for 10 days. Clinical response, evaluated at the posttreatment visit (days 14 to 16), was rated as clinical cure, improvement, failure, relapse/recurrence, or not assessable. The clinical response was considered successful if the posttreatment assessment was clinical cure or clinical improvement and unsuccessful if the assessment was clinical failure, relapse/recurrence, or not assessable. Tolerability was evaluated by observed and spontaneously reported adverse events. A total of 205 patients were enrolled in the study. The ceftibuten group (51 males, 51 females; mean age, 4.8 years, range, 0.5 to 10.7 years) was similar in demographic characteristics to the cefprozil group (60 males, 43 females; mean age, 4.8 years, range, 0.7 to 10.7 years). In the ceftibuten-treated group, 83.3% (85) of the 102 patients had a successful response compared with 82.5% (85) of the 103 patients in the cefprozil-treated group. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in both groups, occurring in 5.9% (6) of the ceftibuten-treated patients and 5.8% (6) of the cefprozil-treated patients. Once-daily ceftibuten oral suspension was as effective and well tolerated as twice-daily cefprozil in the treatment of acute otitis media in children. The once-daily dosing schedule for ceftibuten therapy may aid patient compliance, particularly in the pediatric population. Ceftibuten should prove to be a useful alternative in the treatment of acute otitis media.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily ceftibuten and twice-daily cefprozil in the treatment of children with acute otitis media.
Clin Ther. 1996 Sep-Oct;18(5):811-20. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80041-5.
2
Cefprozil versus high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate in children with acute otitis media.头孢丙烯与高剂量阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的对比研究
Clin Ther. 2001 Feb;23(2):193-204. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80002-3.
3
Multinational multicenter controlled trial comparing ceftibuten with cefaclor for the treatment of acute otitis media. Members of the Ceftibuten Otitis Media International Study Group.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995 Jul;14(7 Suppl):S115-20. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199507001-00008.
4
Efficacy of ceftibuten in 5 versus 10 days treatment of recurrent acute otitis media in children.头孢布烯治疗儿童复发性急性中耳炎5天与10天疗程的疗效比较
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2000 Sep 29;55(2):109-15. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00383-9.
5
Efficacy and tolerability assessment of cefprozil in children with acute otitis media.头孢丙烯治疗儿童急性中耳炎的疗效及耐受性评估
Indian J Pediatr. 2004 Apr;71(4):319-24. doi: 10.1007/BF02724098.
6
Five-day versus ten-day treatment of acute otitis media with cefprozil.头孢丙烯治疗急性中耳炎的五日疗法与十日疗法对比
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 Apr;16(4):283-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01695632.
7
Multicenter controlled trial comparing ceftibuten with amoxicillin/clavulanate in the empiric treatment of acute otitis media. Members of the Ceftibuten Otitis Media United States Study Group.多中心对照试验:比较头孢布烯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸在急性中耳炎经验性治疗中的疗效。美国头孢布烯中耳炎研究组成员。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995 Jul;14(7 Suppl):S108-14. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199507001-00007.
8
Comparison of ceftibuten once daily and amoxicillin-clavulanate three times daily in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.头孢布烯每日一次与阿莫西林-克拉维酸每日三次治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的比较。
Clin Ther. 1998 Jan-Feb;20(1):88-100. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80037-4.
9
Multi-investigator evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cefprozil, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime and cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media.多位研究者对头孢丙烯、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢克肟和头孢克洛治疗急性中耳炎的疗效和安全性进行的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):857-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02111353.
10
Five-day cefdinir course vs. ten-day cefprozil course for treatment of acute otitis media.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Dec;19(12 Suppl):S147-52. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200012001-00003.