Laibovitz R, Boyle J, Snyder E, Strohmaier K, Adamsons I
Eye Research Associates, Austin, Texas, USA.
Clin Ther. 1996 Sep-Oct;18(5):821-32. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80042-7.
The purpose of this study was to compare 2% dorzolamide three times daily with 2% pilocarpine four times daily to determine patient preference, tolerability, and impact on daily life in patients concurrently receiving 0.5% timolol twice daily for treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Seventy-five patients were enrolled in this 4-week, randomized, two-period, crossover study. The Comparison of Ophthalmic Medications for Tolerability questionnaire was used to assess patient preference and perception of side effects and activity limitations resulting from the study medications. IOP measurements were obtained 2 hours after drops were instilled and visual field tests were performed at baseline and at the end of each crossover period. Significantly more patients receiving pilocarpine than dorzolamide reported adverse experiences and discontinued the drug because of these adverse experiences. Similarly, patients reported more interference with their daily life because of side effects and activity limitations when receiving pilocarpine. Vision difficulties, accommodation difficulties, and brow ache were reported more often and were considered more bothersome by patients receiving pilocarpine. Bitter/unusual taste was reported more frequently and was considered more bothersome by patients receiving dorzolamide. Patients also reported missing fewer doses and were more satisfied with their medication when receiving dorzolamide. All of these changes were considered statistically significant. IOP control was not significantly different with either dorzolamide or pilocarpine. However, patients experienced a significant worsening of the mean defect of automated visual field examinations when receiving pilocarpine. At the end of the study, among patients with a preference, dorzolamide was preferred to pilocarpine by a ratio of more than 9:1. Overall, 81.9% of patients preferred dorzolamide. Thus dorzolamide demonstrated better tolerability and less adverse impact on daily life than pilocarpine.
本研究的目的是比较每日三次使用2%多佐胺与每日四次使用2%毛果芸香碱,以确定在同时每日两次使用0.5%噻吗洛尔治疗眼压升高(IOP)的患者中,患者的偏好、耐受性以及对日常生活的影响。75名患者参与了这项为期4周的随机、两阶段、交叉研究。使用眼科药物耐受性比较问卷来评估患者对研究药物的偏好、对副作用的感知以及活动受限情况。在滴入眼药水2小时后测量眼压,并在基线以及每个交叉阶段结束时进行视野测试。与使用多佐胺的患者相比,使用毛果芸香碱的患者报告有不良经历并因这些不良经历而停药的人数显著更多。同样,患者报告在使用毛果芸香碱时,由于副作用和活动受限,对其日常生活的干扰更大。视力困难、调节困难和眉痛在使用毛果芸香碱的患者中报告得更频繁,且患者认为更困扰。接受多佐胺的患者更频繁地报告有苦味/异常味道,且认为更困扰。患者还报告在使用多佐胺时漏服药物的次数更少,对药物更满意。所有这些变化均被认为具有统计学意义。使用多佐胺或毛果芸香碱时眼压控制无显著差异。然而,患者在使用毛果芸香碱时自动视野检查的平均缺损有显著恶化。在研究结束时,在有偏好的患者中,多佐胺比毛果芸香碱更受青睐,比例超过9:1。总体而言,81.9%的患者更喜欢多佐胺。因此,与毛果芸香碱相比,多佐胺表现出更好的耐受性和对日常生活的不良影响更小。