Suppr超能文献

经皮氧分压在水肿性伤口评估中的应用。

Use of transcutaneous pressure of oxygen in the evaluation of edematous wounds.

作者信息

Dooley J, Schirmer J, Slade B, Folden B

机构信息

Crew Technology Division (AL/CFTF), Brooks Air Force Base, Texas 78235-5104, USA.

出版信息

Undersea Hyperb Med. 1996 Sep;23(3):167-74.

PMID:8931284
Abstract

Transcutaneous pressure of oxygen (Ptco2) was measured in edematous wounds before and after a regimen of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy, in patients breathing normobaric air (AIR), 100% normobaric oxygen (O2), and 100% O2 at 239 kPa (2.36 atm abs; HBO). Wounds also were scored for severity, including three ratings for periwound edema. Only during AIR was pre Ptc O2 of markedly edematous wounds significantly lower than that of moderately edematous and non-edematous wounds (P < 0.001). After HBO2 therapy, wound severity score and periwound edema rating decreased significantly (P < 0.001), and periwound edema ratings could no longer be distinguished by PtcO2. Although pre periwound PtcO2 measured during both O2 and HBO evaluations was significantly greater than that measured during AIR (P < 0.0001) and was positively correlated with subsequent change in wound severity (P < 0.05), regression analyses failed to yield a significant prediction equation. The authors conclude: a) dramatically marked increases in PtcO2 of normally hypoxic (< 30 Torr O2) edematous wounds during O2 and HBO challenges demonstrate that periwound edema is an O2 diffusion barrier during normal conditions; b) HBO2 therapy significantly reduces periwound edema in markedly edematous wounds; c) despite significant correlations between pre-therapy periwound PtcO2 measured during O2 and HBO challenges and changes in wound severity, single PtcO2 measurements are not predictive of changes in periwound edema or overall wound severity.

摘要

在接受高压氧(HBO₂)治疗方案前后,对水肿伤口的经皮氧分压(Ptco₂)进行了测量,这些患者分别呼吸常压空气(AIR)、100%常压氧(O₂)以及239 kPa(2.36绝对大气压;HBO)下的100% O₂。还对伤口的严重程度进行了评分,包括对伤口周围水肿的三项评级。仅在呼吸AIR期间,明显水肿伤口的治疗前Ptco₂显著低于中度水肿和非水肿伤口(P < 0.001)。HBO₂治疗后,伤口严重程度评分和伤口周围水肿评级显著降低(P < 0.001),并且伤口周围水肿评级不再能通过Ptco₂区分。尽管在O₂和HBO评估期间测量的治疗前伤口周围Ptco₂显著高于在AIR期间测量的值(P < 0.0001),并且与伤口严重程度的后续变化呈正相关(P < 0.05),但回归分析未能得出显著的预测方程。作者得出结论:a)在O₂和HBO刺激期间,正常低氧(< 30 Torr O₂)水肿伤口的Ptco₂显著大幅增加,表明伤口周围水肿在正常情况下是氧扩散屏障;b)HBO₂治疗可显著减轻明显水肿伤口的伤口周围水肿;c)尽管在O₂和HBO刺激期间测量的治疗前伤口周围Ptco₂与伤口严重程度变化之间存在显著相关性,但单次Ptco₂测量无法预测伤口周围水肿或整体伤口严重程度的变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验