Tisdale J E, Rudis M I, Padhi I D, Borzak S, Svensson C K, Webb C R, Acciaioli J, Ware J A, Krepostman A, Zarowitz B J
College of Pharmacy and Allied Health, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Jan;36(1):35-41. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04149.x.
Dosage reduction of procainamide has been recommended in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). However, these recommendations are based primarily on studies with unmatched control groups, suboptimal blood sampling, and in patients not receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. These agents increase renal blood flow, which theoretically may offset alterations in drug disposition in patients with CHF. The pharmacokinetics of procainamide in patients with chronic CHF and in matched controls were compared. A single intravenous dose of 750 mg of procainamide was administered to 9 patients with chronic New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III CHF (mean +/- SD left ventricular ejection fraction 22 +/- 9%) receiving medical therapy and 7 control subjects matched for age and gender. Blood and urine samples were collected at intervals over a period of 48 and 72 hours, respectively. Patients with CHF and control subjects were demographically similar, with the exception of concomitant medications, including ACE inhibitors (8/9 versus 1/7, respectively). There were no significant differences between patients with CHF and control subjects in mean +/- SD peak serum concentrations (Cmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity), total clearance, renal clearance, half-life (t1/2), or volume of distribution (Vd) of procainamide. Similarly, there were no significant differences between patients with CHF and control subjects in the mean +/- SD Cmax, AUC0-infinity, renal clearance, or t1/2 of N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA). Procainamide dosage reduction may not be necessary in patients with chronic stable CHF who are receiving medical therapy.
对于充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者,已建议减少普鲁卡因胺的剂量。然而,这些建议主要基于对未匹配对照组的研究、次优的血样采集,且研究对象未接受血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂治疗。这些药物会增加肾血流量,从理论上讲,这可能会抵消CHF患者药物处置的改变。比较了慢性CHF患者和匹配对照组中普鲁卡因胺的药代动力学。对9例接受药物治疗的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)II级或III级慢性CHF患者(平均±标准差左心室射血分数22±9%)和7例年龄及性别匹配的对照受试者静脉注射单次剂量750mg普鲁卡因胺。分别在48小时和72小时内间隔采集血样和尿样。CHF患者和对照受试者在人口统计学上相似,但伴随用药情况不同,包括ACE抑制剂(分别为8/9和1/7)。CHF患者和对照受试者在普鲁卡因胺的平均±标准差峰血清浓度(Cmax)、血清浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-∞)、总清除率、肾清除率、半衰期(t1/2)或分布容积(Vd)方面无显著差异。同样,CHF患者和对照受试者在N-乙酰普鲁卡因胺(NAPA)的平均±标准差Cmax、AUC0-∞、肾清除率或t1/2方面也无显著差异。对于接受药物治疗的慢性稳定CHF患者,可能无需减少普鲁卡因胺剂量。