Suppr超能文献

支气管动力学测试中呼气峰值流速的价值。

Value of the peak expiratory flow in bronchodynamic tests.

作者信息

Pino J M, García-Río F, Prados C, Alvarez-Sala R, Díaz S, Villasante C, Villamor J

机构信息

Service of Pneumology, La Paz Hospital, School of Medicine, Autónoma University, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996 Mar-Apr;24(2):54-7.

PMID:8933890
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of the peak expiratory flow (PEF) as an alternative parameter to the forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV1) in the bronchodynamic tests.

METHODOLOGY

We studied 84 patients, 53 males and 31 females, with average age 46 +/- 13 years, as clinic suspects of bronchial asthma. PEF was determined with a "mini-Wright peak flow meter" and a spirometry was obtained. Based on the results, 44 subjects were classified under group 1 (FEV1/FVC < 70% and FEV1 < 80% of theoretic value) and subjected to a bronchodilator test. While in group 2 subjects (normal spirometry), a methacholine challenge was performed. During each procedure, PEF readings were obtained before FEV1 determination. The usefulness of the PEF for the diagnosis of reversibility or bronchial obstruction with respect to the FEV1 was assessed in both groups.

RESULTS

In the bronchodilator tests, a cut-off point was found for the increase in the PEF > 18%, which showed a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 79%, positive predictive value of 77% and negative predictive value of 86%, with respect to an increase in the FEV1 > 15%. In the methacholine challenge, a decrease in the PEF > 12% only achieved a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 71%.

CONCLUSION

Peak expiratory flow may be an useful parameter in bronchodilator tests. However, it should not be used in methacholine challenge.

摘要

目的

确定在支气管动力学测试中,呼气峰值流速(PEF)作为第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)替代参数的准确性。

方法

我们研究了84例患者,其中男性53例,女性31例,平均年龄46±13岁,临床怀疑为支气管哮喘。使用“小型赖特峰值流量计”测定PEF,并进行肺活量测定。根据结果,44名受试者被归为第1组(FEV1/FVC<70%且FEV1<理论值的80%)并接受支气管扩张试验。而第2组受试者(肺活量测定正常)则进行了乙酰甲胆碱激发试验。在每个操作过程中,在测定FEV1之前获取PEF读数。在两组中评估了PEF相对于FEV1在诊断可逆性或支气管阻塞方面的有用性。

结果

在支气管扩张试验中,发现PEF增加>18%的截断点,相对于FEV1增加>15%,其敏感性为85%,特异性为79%,阳性预测值为77%,阴性预测值为86%。在乙酰甲胆碱激发试验中,PEF降低>12%仅达到74%的敏感性和71%的特异性。

结论

呼气峰值流速在支气管扩张试验中可能是一个有用的参数。然而,它不应在乙酰甲胆碱激发试验中使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验