Oki J, Cho K
Department of Pediatrics, Asahikawa Medical College, Japan.
Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi. 1996 Sep;71(5):637-50.
From January 1982 to December 1986, 113 three-year-old children (100 boys and 13 girls) visited the department of pediatrics, Asahikawa Medical College, because of delayed development of language (their expressive language age less than two-year-old). Of these children, 102 children (90%) have visited until they graduated from junior high school for the evaluation of intelligence quotient (IQ), diagnosis, the type of attended school and complications. The mean follow-up period was 10.8 years. The 113 children ware classified as 32 cases of developmental language disorder (DLD), 38 of autistic disorder (Au), 39 of mental retardation (MR), and 4 of deafness based on the results of clinical examination (DSM-III-R), ABR and WPPSI/WISC-R. The purpose of this study is to compare the assessment of language development at the age 3 with the prognosis for intelligence, academic achievement and behavioral adjustment. At the age of three, we divided them into three groups using the Enjoji shiki hattatsu kensa-hyo. Group A including 31 children (29 boys and 2 girls) means delayed development in verbal expression only. Group B including 23 children (17 boys and 6 girls) means delayed development in verbal expression and comprehension. Group C including 59 children (54 boys and 5 girls) means delayed development not only in verbal expression and comprehension but also in communication skills.
ABR: Four (2 boys and 2 girls) of 113 children did not show any significant waves on ABR at aged 3, and were also diagnosed as deafness by another audiometry. Comparison between the assessment of verbal expression at aged 3 and full scale IQ (FSIQ): FSIQs in 77% of group A were more than 70, while FSIQs in 79% of groups B and C were 70 or below. The assessment of verbal comprehension at aged 3 was significantly related with FSIQ (x2 = 23.88, p < 0.01). Classification of disorders and type of schools according to the assessment at aged 3: [Group A] Thirty one children were classified as 25 cases of DLD and 6 of MR. Before a graduation from junior high school, 20 children attended regular classes and 8 attended special classes for MR. [Group B] Twenty three children were classified as 4 cases of DLD, 10 of MR, 5 of Au and 4 of deafness. Before a graduation from junior high school, 4 children attended regular classes, 8 attended special classes for MR, 6 attended special schools for MR and 4 attended schools for deafness. [Group C] Fifty nine children were classified as 3 cases of DLD, 23 of MR and 33 of Au. Before graduating from junior high school, 10 children attended regular classes, 18 attended special classes for MR, 19 attended special schools for MR and 2 entered educational facilities.
1982年1月至1986年12月,旭川医科大学儿科收治了113名3岁儿童(100名男孩和13名女孩),这些儿童存在语言发育迟缓(其表达性语言年龄小于2岁)。其中102名儿童(90%)在初中毕业前前来进行智商(IQ)评估、诊断、就读学校类型及并发症方面的检查。平均随访期为10.8年。根据临床检查(DSM - III - R)、听性脑干反应(ABR)及韦氏学前和初小儿童智力量表/韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WPPSI/WISC - R)的结果,将这113名儿童分为发育性语言障碍(DLD)32例、孤独症谱系障碍(Au)38例、智力障碍(MR)39例及耳聋4例。本研究的目的是比较3岁时语言发育评估结果与智力、学业成绩及行为适应的预后情况。3岁时,我们使用江藤式发育检查表将他们分为三组。A组包括31名儿童(29名男孩和2名女孩),仅表示言语表达发育迟缓。B组包括23名儿童(17名男孩和6名女孩),表示言语表达和理解发育迟缓。C组包括59名儿童(54名男孩和5名女孩),表示不仅言语表达和理解发育迟缓,沟通能力也发育迟缓。
ABR:113名儿童中有4名(2名男孩和2名女孩)在3岁时ABR未显示任何明显波峰,且通过另一种听力测试也被诊断为耳聋。3岁时言语表达评估与全量表智商(FSIQ)的比较:A组77%的儿童FSIQ高于70,而B组和C组79%的儿童FSIQ为70及以下。3岁时言语理解评估与FSIQ显著相关(x2 = 23.88,p < 0.01)。根据3岁时的评估结果对疾病分类及学校类型:[A组]31名儿童分为25例DLD和6例MR。初中毕业前,20名儿童就读普通班级,8名儿童就读MR特殊班级。[B组]23名儿童分为4例DLD、10例MR、5例Au和4例耳聋。初中毕业前,4名儿童就读普通班级,8名儿童就读MR特殊班级,6名儿童就读MR特殊学校,4名儿童就读聋校。[C组]59名儿童分为3例DLD、23例MR和33例Au。初中毕业前,10名儿童就读普通班级,18名儿童就读MR特殊班级,19名儿童就读MR特殊学校,2名儿童进入教育机构。