• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种测量牙科材料广义磨损方法的比较。

Comparison of two methods for measuring generalized wear of dental materials.

作者信息

Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Osaka University, Japan.

出版信息

J Osaka Univ Dent Sch. 1994 Dec;34:1-8.

PMID:8935088
Abstract

The object of this study was to analyze two measuring methods for determining the amount of generalized wear of dental materials. Using a recently developed three-body wear testing machine, generalized wear defect was produced on the surface of various dental materials. Although the generalized wear was defined as the depth of the enamel exposed at the cavity margin for both methods, this depth was measured with two different devices. One is an image-analyzer and the other was a profilometer. From the results of this study, it was confirmed that measurement by means of profilometer gave almost the same wear values with those by image-analyzer. In addition, the measurement by profilometer seemed to be more precise and not very much sophisticated.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析两种用于测定牙科材料总体磨损量的测量方法。使用最近开发的三体磨损试验机,在各种牙科材料表面产生总体磨损缺陷。虽然两种方法都将总体磨损定义为洞缘处暴露的牙釉质深度,但该深度是用两种不同的设备测量的。一种是图像分析仪,另一种是轮廓仪。从本研究结果可知,轮廓仪测量得到的磨损值与图像分析仪测量得到的磨损值几乎相同。此外,轮廓仪测量似乎更精确且不太复杂。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two methods for measuring generalized wear of dental materials.两种测量牙科材料广义磨损方法的比较。
J Osaka Univ Dent Sch. 1994 Dec;34:1-8.
2
Round robin test: wear of nine dental restorative materials in six different wear simulators - supplement to the round robin test of 2005.均相测试:六种不同磨损模拟装置中九种牙科修复材料的磨损 - 2005 年均相测试的补充。
Dent Mater. 2011 Feb;27(2):e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.003.
3
In vitro quantitative assessment of generalized wear of dental composites.牙科复合材料广义磨损的体外定量评估。
J Osaka Univ Dent Sch. 1994 Dec;34:9-18.
4
A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.三种不同方法用于定量牙科材料体外磨损的比较。
Dent Mater. 2006 Nov;22(11):1051-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.08.010. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
5
In situ effect of an erosive challenge on different restorative materials and on enamel adjacent to these materials.侵蚀性刺激对不同修复材料及这些材料相邻牙釉质的原位影响。
J Dent. 2008 Feb;36(2):152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.11.013. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
6
Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test.五种磨损模拟器中十种牙科修复材料的磨损情况——循环试验结果
Dent Mater. 2005 Apr;21(4):304-17. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.003.
7
A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.间接复合树脂耐磨性与硬度的比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Apr;85(4):386-95. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.114267.
8
In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.间接复合树脂修复体的体外磨损
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Oct;88(4):431-6. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128747.
9
Surface wear on cervical restorations and adjacent enamel and root cementum caused by simulated long-term maintenance therapy.模拟长期维持治疗对颈部修复体及相邻牙釉质和牙根牙骨质造成的表面磨损。
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Apr;31(4):293-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00482.x.
10
Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.使用两种不同的磨损模拟方法研究拮抗剂材料对不同复合材料磨损的影响。
Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):166-75. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.012. Epub 2005 Aug 8.