• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

古巴和大韩民国的生育转变:有组织的计划生育的影响。

The fertility transition in Cuba and the Federal Republic of Korea: the impact of organised family planning.

作者信息

Noble J, Potts M

机构信息

Center for Latin American Studies, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

出版信息

J Biosoc Sci. 1996 Apr;28(2):211-25. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000022252.

DOI:10.1017/s0021932000022252
PMID:8935877
Abstract

South Korea and Cuba are dissimilar in religion, economy, culture and attitudes toward premarital sexual relations. In 1960, Korea instituted a national family planning programme to combat rapid population growth. Cuba explicitly rejected Malthusian policies, but made family planning universally available in 1974 in response to health needs. Both countries have undergone rapid fertility declines and today have less than replacement level fertility. Both countries have also used a similar mixture of methods, including a high prevalence of female sterilisation. Abortion has played a major role in the fertility decline of both countries, rising in the first half of the fertility transition and then falling, although remaining a significant variable in the second half. It is concluded that access to contraception, voluntary sterilisation, and safe abortion has a direct impact on fertility and has been associated with a rapid fall in family size in two very different countries.

摘要

韩国和古巴在宗教、经济、文化以及对婚前性行为的态度方面存在差异。1960年,韩国实施了一项全国性的计划生育计划,以应对人口的快速增长。古巴明确拒绝马尔萨斯主义政策,但在1974年,出于健康需求,使计划生育普及开来。两国的生育率都迅速下降,如今均低于更替水平生育率。两国还采用了类似的方法组合,包括女性绝育的高普及率。堕胎在两国生育率下降过程中都起到了主要作用,在生育转变的前半期上升,然后下降,尽管在后半期仍然是一个重要变量。得出的结论是,获得避孕措施、自愿绝育和安全堕胎直接影响生育率,并与两个非常不同的国家家庭规模的迅速下降有关。

相似文献

1
The fertility transition in Cuba and the Federal Republic of Korea: the impact of organised family planning.古巴和大韩民国的生育转变:有组织的计划生育的影响。
J Biosoc Sci. 1996 Apr;28(2):211-25. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000022252.
2
South Korea's low fertility raises European-style issues.韩国的低生育率引发了类似欧洲的问题。
Popul Today. 1991 Oct;19(10):3.
3
Australian teenagers and pregnancy.澳大利亚青少年与怀孕。
J Aust Popul Assoc. 1984 Autumn;1:31-40. doi: 10.1007/BF03029374.
4
[Family planning programs and birth control in the third world].[第三世界的计划生育项目与节育]
Demogr Inf. 1991:17-34, 153.
5
Adolescent reproductive behavior: an international comparison of developed countries.青少年生殖行为:发达国家的国际比较
Adv Adolesc Mental Health. 1990;4:13-34.
6
The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.避孕措施改善对西方国家生育率和堕胎率的潜在影响。
Eur J Popul. 1987 Nov;3(1):7-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01797090.
7
Family planning, AIDS, and FHI.计划生育、艾滋病与家庭健康国际组织
Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1991 Sep;12(2):22-5.
8
Eastern Europe: pronatalist policies and private behavior.东欧:鼓励生育政策与个人行为
Popul Bull. 1982 Feb;36(6):1-49.
9
Revolution without ideology: demographic transition in East Asia.没有意识形态的革命:东亚的人口转变
Philipp Geogr J. 1980 Jan-Mar;24(1):33-44.
10
[Changing pattern of National Family Planning and Fertility Survey in Korea].[韩国国家计划生育与生育率调查的变化模式]
Bogeon sahoe nonjib. 1991 Dec;11(2):1-18.

引用本文的文献

1
Population Policy: Abortion and Modern Contraception Are Substitutes.人口政策:堕胎与现代避孕手段互为替代。
Demography. 2016 Aug;53(4):979-1009. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0492-8.
2
The impact of freedom on fertility decline.自由对生育率下降的影响。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2013 Jan;39(1):44-50. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100405.