Soliman A T, abdul Khadir M M
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alexandria, School of Medicine, Egypt.
J Trop Pediatr. 1996 Oct;42(5):281-6. doi: 10.1093/tropej/42.5.281.
Seventy-seven prepubertal short children with heights below the third centile for age and gender were divided into three groups according to their peak GH response to clonidine and insulin provocation. Group (I) included 30 children with peak GH response < 7 micrograms/l, group (II) included 19 children, with GH peak response between 7 and 10 micrograms/l, and group (III) included 24 children with GH peak > 10 micrograms/l. Each group was divided into two subgroups, a and b. Subgroups (I)b, (II)a and (III)b were treated daily for 1 year with subcutaneous recombinant human growth hormone (GH) 15 U/m2/week, and group (I)a was treated with GH (30 U/m2/week). Before initiation of treatment, the chronological age, the height standard deviation score (HtSDS), and the bone age delay did not differ among the study subgroups. The height growth velocity (GV) and insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations were significantly higher in group (III), with normal GH response to provocation, compared to those for group (I) with GH deficiency. All the children had normal thyroid function and normal glucose tolerance. CT examination of the hypothalamic-pituitary area revealed a picture of empty sella (either partial or complete) in 35 per cent of the children in group (I) and 21 per cent of children in group (II). After 1 year of GH therapy, the HtSDS, GV, and IGF-I concentrations increased significantly in the four subgroups treated with GH compared to their pretreatment values and to their controls. All the children in group (I) were responders (increment in GV of 2 cm2/year above the pretreatment GV), of the nine subjects treated in group (II)a, one child was a non-responder and of the 12 children in group (III)a three children were non-responders. GV was non-significantly higher in group (I)a (30 U/m2/week) v. group (I)b (15 U/m2/week). GV of children in groups (I)b, with abnormal GH response to provocation, was significantly higher than GV of children in group (III)a. Bone age advanced by less than 1 year in the treated groups (0.84 +/- 0.14 years) v. the untreated groups (0.73 +/- 0.3 years). None of the children had impaired glucose tolerance or abnormal thyroid function after 1 year of GH therapy. In all the treated children, GV after 1 year of GH treatment was correlated significantly with the pretreatment GV (r = -0.63, P < 0.01), peak GH response to provocation (r = -0.59, P < 0.01), IGF-I concentration (r = -0.54, P < 0.01), and positively with the GH dose (r = 0.589, P < 0.01). In group (III) children, with normal GH reserve, GV correlated significantly with the pretreatment GV (r = -0.48, P < 0.01) and negatively with the GH peak response to provocation (r = -0.25, P < 0.05). In conclusion, GH therapy improved GV of children growing along or parallel to the 3rd centile, irrespective of their GH response to provocation, without untoward effect on skeletal maturation, thyroid function or glucose tolerance.
77名青春期前身材矮小的儿童,其身高低于同年龄、同性别儿童身高的第三百分位数,根据可乐定和胰岛素激发试验中生长激素(GH)的峰值反应,将他们分为三组。第一组(I组)包括30名生长激素峰值反应<7微克/升的儿童,第二组(II组)包括19名生长激素峰值反应在7至10微克/升之间的儿童,第三组(III组)包括24名生长激素峰值>10微克/升的儿童。每组又分为两个亚组,a组和b组。亚组(I)b、(II)a和(III)b每天皮下注射重组人生长激素(GH)15U/m²/周,治疗1年,(I)a组则接受30U/m²/周的生长激素治疗。在开始治疗前,各研究亚组之间的实际年龄、身高标准差评分(HtSDS)和骨龄延迟情况并无差异。与生长激素缺乏的第一组相比,第三组生长激素对激发试验反应正常,其身高生长速度(GV)和胰岛素样生长因子-I浓度显著更高。所有儿童甲状腺功能和糖耐量均正常。下丘脑-垂体区域的CT检查显示,第一组35%的儿童和第二组21%的儿童存在空蝶鞍(部分或完全)影像。生长激素治疗1年后,接受生长激素治疗的四个亚组的HtSDS、GV和IGF-I浓度与治疗前值及对照组相比均显著增加。第一组所有儿童均有反应(生长速度增量比治疗前生长速度每年增加2厘米²),(II)a组治疗的9名受试者中,1名儿童无反应,(III)a组的12名儿童中有3名儿童无反应。(I)a组(30U/m²/周)的生长速度与(I)b组(15U/m²/周)相比无显著差异。对激发试验生长激素反应异常的(I)b组儿童的生长速度显著高于(III)a组儿童。治疗组骨龄进展小于1年(0.84±0.14岁),未治疗组为(0.73±0.3岁)。生长激素治疗1年后,所有儿童均未出现糖耐量受损或甲状腺功能异常。在所有接受治疗的儿童中,生长激素治疗1年后的生长速度与治疗前生长速度显著相关(r = -0.63,P<0.01)、与激发试验生长激素峰值反应显著相关(r = -0.59,P<0.01)、与IGF-I浓度显著相关(r = -0.54,P<0.01),且与生长激素剂量呈正相关(r = 0.589,P<0.01)。在生长激素储备正常的第三组儿童中,生长速度与治疗前生长速度显著相关(r = -0.48,P<0.01),与激发试验生长激素峰值反应呈负相关(r = -0.25,P<0.05)。总之,生长激素治疗可改善身高沿着或平行于第三百分位数增长的儿童的生长速度,无论其对激发试验的生长激素反应如何,且对骨骼成熟、甲状腺功能或糖耐量无不良影响。