King H F, Carroll J L, Fuller G B
J Clin Psychol. 1977 Jul;33(3):725-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197707)33:3<725::aid-jclp2270330324>3.0.co;2-w.
The literature indicates inconsistent results when MMPI differences between black Ss and white Ss were investigated. In general, most studies found that blacks responded in a more pathological direction. However, previous studies can be criticized because they have used students, prisoners, and hospital patients as Ss with variables that were controlled inconsistently and varied widely. In this study a comparison was made of MMPI scales for 56 black and 56 white males who were full-time employees of a large chemical company. Ss were matched for age, education, occupation, seniority, mental ability level, and socioeconomic level. The 10 standard clinical and 3 validity MMPI scales were recorded for each S as well as six experimental scales: Control (C), Dependency (DPD), Dominance (DOM), Ego Strength (ES), Anxiety Index (AI), and Internalization Ratio (IR). Using K corrected T-scores for the MMPI scales, a repeated measures analysis of variance indicated that subtests and group X subtests were significant. More specifically, blacks scored significantly higher than white Ss on the MA scale, and white Ss scored significantly higher than blacks on the PA, C, DOM, and Es scales. While the present study did find significant differences between black and white Ss on the MMPI, the scores were all well within the normal range (T less than 70), and all scales but two were less than 60.
文献表明,在对黑人和白人被试的明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)差异进行研究时,结果并不一致。总体而言,大多数研究发现黑人的反应更趋于病态。然而,以往的研究可能会受到批评,因为它们使用学生、囚犯和医院患者作为被试,且对变量的控制不一致,差异很大。在本研究中,对一家大型化工公司的56名黑人男性全职员工和56名白人男性全职员工的MMPI量表进行了比较。被试在年龄、教育程度、职业、资历、智力水平和社会经济水平方面进行了匹配。记录了每个被试的10个标准临床量表和3个效度MMPI量表,以及6个实验量表:控制量表(C)、依赖量表(DPD)、支配量表(DOM)、自我力量量表(ES)、焦虑指数(AI)和内化比率(IR)。使用MMPI量表的K校正T分数,重复测量方差分析表明,子测验以及组×子测验具有显著性。更具体地说,黑人在MA量表上的得分显著高于白人被试,而白人被试在PA、C、DOM和ES量表上的得分显著高于黑人。虽然本研究确实发现黑人和白人被试在MMPI上存在显著差异,但分数都完全在正常范围内(T小于70),除两个量表外,所有量表都小于60。