Vamvakas E C, Carven J H, Hibberd P L
Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Transfusion. 1996 Nov-Dec;36(11-12):1000-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36111297091746.x.
Many observational studies have described an association between perioperative transfusion and postoperative infection. Detection of such a relationship may depend on which variables are considered as potential confounders of the association under study. However, most reports have not considered risk factors for postoperative infection at specific sites as possible explanations for the observed relationship.
The records of 492 patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resection at the Massachusetts General Hospital between January 1992 and December 1994 were reviewed. The probability of infection in association with transfusion was calculated with and without adjustment for the effects of chronic systemic illness, number of days with urinary catheter, endotracheal intubation, impaired consciousness, and specific risk factors for wound infection. Postoperative infection at any site and infections at specific sites were analyzed as separate outcomes.
After adjustment for the effects of the variables listed above, allogeneic transfusion was not associated with postoperative infection at any site (p = 0.407). Only a specific association of transfusion with wound infection could be detected. However, in an analysis that adjusted for the effects of only the 18 confounders considered by previous authors, transfusion was the most significant predictor of infection. In that analysis, the risk of postoperative infection increased by 14 percent per unit of red cells transfused (p < 0.001).
The overall adverse relationship between transfusion and infection reported by previous observational studies may have been due to an incomplete consideration of the variables that confound that association. This finding may help explain the disagreement between the conclusions of recent large, randomized, controlled trials (which failed to detect a deleterious transfusion effect) and the earlier observational studies.
许多观察性研究描述了围手术期输血与术后感染之间的关联。这种关系的发现可能取决于哪些变量被视为所研究关联的潜在混杂因素。然而,大多数报告并未将特定部位术后感染的危险因素作为观察到的关系的可能解释。
回顾了1992年1月至1994年12月在马萨诸塞州总医院接受择期结直肠癌切除术的492例患者的记录。在调整慢性全身性疾病、留置尿管天数、气管插管、意识障碍以及伤口感染的特定危险因素的影响后,计算输血相关的感染概率。将任何部位的术后感染和特定部位的感染作为单独的结果进行分析。
在调整上述变量的影响后,异体输血与任何部位的术后感染均无关联(p = 0.407)。仅检测到输血与伤口感染之间存在特定关联。然而,在仅调整先前作者考虑的18个混杂因素影响的分析中,输血是感染的最显著预测因素。在该分析中,每输注一个单位红细胞,术后感染风险增加14%(p < 0.001)。
先前观察性研究报告的输血与感染之间的总体不良关系可能是由于对混淆该关联的变量考虑不全面所致。这一发现可能有助于解释近期大型随机对照试验(未检测到有害的输血效应)与早期观察性研究结论之间的差异。