Are somatosensory evoked potential recording and magnetic resonance imaging useful for evaluating the risk of neurologic compromise in rheumatoid arthritis patients with atlantoaxial subluxation?

The objective of this study was to determine whether early somatosensory evoked potential recording and/or magnetic resonance imaging are helpful for evaluating and monitoring the risk of neurologic compromise in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Thirty-seven patients with definite rheumatoid arthritis were studied, including 18 with atlantoaxial subluxation. A physical examination, roentgenograms of the cervical spine, early somatosensory evoked potential recording at all four limbs and magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine were done in each case. Alterations in somatosensory evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging evidence of compression of the medulla oblongata or spinal cord were found in similar proportions of patients with and without atlantoaxial subluxation. These results support the view that physical findings and changes on plain films of the cervical spine are the most reliable data for evaluating and monitoring the risk of neurologic damage in patients with atlantoaxial subluxation. Somatosensory evoked potential studies and magnetic resonance imaging should be reserved for those cases in which physical and roentgenographic data cannot be collected in a satisfactory manner and for patients who are included in study protocols that require accurate evaluation of lesions.