Doherty M M, Hughes P J, Charman S A, Brock K V, Korszniak N V, Charman W N
Department of Pharmaceutics, Victorian College of Pharmacy, Monash University, Parkville, Australia.
Anesth Analg. 1996 Dec;83(6):1244-50. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00020.
Previous epidural studies conducted in rabbits have described a viscous lidocaine-hyaluronate formulation (L-HA) that prolonged the duration of sensory blockade twofold and decreased the rate of drug absorption fourfold relative to a solution formulation. As further evaluation of the L-HA formulation required studies in a larger animal that more closely reflected the characteristic absorption kinetics observed in humans, a conscious dog model was used to functionally and kinetically evaluate the viscous formulation relative to lidocaine solution. In terms of the measured pharmacodynamic end point (loss of weight-bearing ability in hind legs), epidural administration of the L-HA formulation did not prolong the duration of action relative to lidocaine solution in spite of a markedly altered pharmacokinetic profile. For example, administration of L-HA reduced the mean plasma lidocaine Cmax value approximately 50% and increased the Tmax value approximately fivefold relative to lidocaine solution. However, the viscous L-HA formulation did cause a significant prolongation in the latency of onset (P < 0.001) relative to lidocaine solution. The dog exhibited "flip-flop" pharmacokinetics and absorption was biphasic after epidural administration of lidocaine solution (apparent t1/2 of the fast and slow absorption phases were 4 min and 131 min, respectively). The L-HA formulation markedly altered the absorption kinetics such that a single, slow absorption phase was evident (apparent t1/2 of 56 min), although this rate was more rapid than the slow phase observed after lidocaine solution. It is possible that the inability of the hyaluronate-based formulation to further reduce the magnitude of the slow absorption phase resulted in the failure to prolong the duration of action. These data highlight the need to carefully consider the absorption kinetics and pharmacokinetic characteristics of the animal models chosen to evaluate new formulation of epidurally administered local anesthetics.
先前在兔子身上进行的硬膜外研究描述了一种粘性利多卡因-透明质酸盐制剂(L-HA),相对于溶液制剂,该制剂可使感觉阻滞持续时间延长两倍,并使药物吸收速率降低四倍。由于对L-HA制剂的进一步评估需要在更大的动物身上进行研究,以更密切地反映在人类身上观察到的特征性吸收动力学,因此使用清醒犬模型从功能和动力学方面评估粘性制剂相对于利多卡因溶液的情况。就所测量的药效学终点(后腿负重能力丧失)而言,尽管药代动力学特征明显改变,但相对于利多卡因溶液,硬膜外给予L-HA制剂并未延长作用持续时间。例如,与利多卡因溶液相比,给予L-HA可使血浆利多卡因Cmax平均值降低约50%,并使Tmax值增加约五倍。然而,相对于利多卡因溶液,粘性L-HA制剂确实使起效潜伏期显著延长(P<0.001)。犬表现出“翻转”药代动力学,硬膜外给予利多卡因溶液后吸收呈双相性(快速和慢速吸收相的表观t1/2分别为4分钟和131分钟)。L-HA制剂显著改变了吸收动力学,使得明显出现单一的慢速吸收相(表观t1/2为56分钟),尽管该速率比利多卡因溶液后的慢速相更快。基于透明质酸盐的制剂无法进一步降低慢速吸收相的幅度,可能导致作用持续时间未能延长。这些数据突出表明,在选择评估硬膜外给予局部麻醉药新制剂的动物模型时,需要仔细考虑其吸收动力学和药代动力学特征。