Suppr超能文献

A comparison of slit-lamp supported versus hand-held biometry.

作者信息

Whelehan I M, Heyworth P, Tabandeh H, McGuigan S, Foss A J

机构信息

Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 1996;10 ( Pt 4):514-6. doi: 10.1038/eye.1996.112.

Abstract

Biometry allows determination of the final refractive outcome following cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. We compared the accuracy of axial length measurement performed with the slit-lamp supported biometry probe versus a hand-held technique. The two methods of biometry were performed on 32 patients undergoing endocapsular cataract extraction with lens implantation. One of the methods was selected at random in order to predict implant power for a desired refractive outcome using the SRK-T formula. There was no difference in 'within-subject' variance of axial length measurement between the two methods (t = 1.74, p = 0.091), and there was no difference in refractive outcome when the power calculations for the two techniques were compared (t = 0.12, p = 0.906). The hand-held technique provides a useful alternative method of biometry in 'difficult' patients.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验