[碘帕醇与碘克沙醇在下肢数字减影血管造影中的比较]
[Comparison between iopamidol and ioxaglate in digital arteriography of the lower limbs].
作者信息
Cercueil J P, Krausé D, Reynaud M, Lamazière I, Charmasson L, Lerais J M, Aho S
机构信息
Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Le Bocage, CHRU, Dijon, France.
出版信息
J Radiol. 1996 Sep;77(9):643-7.
This prospective study concerning 100 subtraction angiographies of the lower limbs compared two iodine concentrations of iopamidol (300 and 370 mg l/l) and ioxaglate (320 and 350 mg l/l). More pain and movements disturbed the subtraction with iopamidol 370 in comparison with ionic contrast media (p < 0.005). The quality of the contrast was better with ioxaglate 350 (p = 0.05) than with the others. This one appears to be a good compromise for this type of examination.
这项关于100例下肢减影血管造影的前瞻性研究比较了碘帕醇（300和370mg/l）和碘克沙醇（320和350mg/l）的两种碘浓度。与离子型造影剂相比，使用370碘帕醇时更多的疼痛和移动干扰了减影效果（p<0.005）。350碘克沙醇的造影质量优于其他造影剂（p = 0.05）。对于这类检查，它似乎是一个很好的折衷选择。
Zotero 插件